Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35095398›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Does Oblique Effect Affect SSVEP-Based Visual Acuity Assessment?

Xiaowei Zheng, Guanghua Xu, Yuhui Du, Hui Li, Chengcheng Han, Peiyuan Tian, Zejin Li, Chenghang Du, Wenqiang Yan, Sicong Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaowei ZhengSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Guanghua XuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yuhui DuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Hui LiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Chengcheng HanSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Peiyuan TianSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Zejin LiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Chenghang DuSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Wenqiang YanSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Sicong ZhangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore whether there was an effect on steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) visual acuity assessment from the oblique effect or the stimulus orientation. SSVEPs were induced by seven visual stimuli, e.g., the reversal sinusoidal gratings with horizontal, two oblique, and vertical orientations, reversal checkerboards with vertical and oblique orientations, and oscillating expansion-contraction concentric-rings, at six spatial frequency steps. Ten subjects participated in the experiment. Subsequently, a threshold estimation criterion was used to determine the objective SSVEP visual acuity corresponding to each visual stimulus. Taking the SSVEP amplitude and signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) of the fundamental reversal frequency as signal characteristics, both the SSVEP amplitude and SNR induced by the reversal sinusoidal gratings at 3.0 cpd among four stimulus orientations had no significant difference, and the same finding was also shown in the checkerboards between vertical and oblique orientation. In addition, the SSVEP visual acuity obtained by the threshold estimation criterion for all seven visual stimuli showed no significant difference. This study demonstrated that the SSVEPs induced by all these seven visual stimuli had a similarly good performance in evaluating visual acuity, and the oblique effect or the stimulus orientation had little effect on SSVEP response as well as the SSVEP visual acuity.

Indexed as

oblique effectspatial frequencysteady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)stimulus orientationvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID35095398
PMCPMC8795862
OpenAlexW4206100281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.