Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35095260›Full record

ArticleUrban ecosystems2022

Green in times of COVID-19: urban green space relevance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Buenos Aires City.

Patricia Laura Marconi, Patricia Eleonora Perelman, Vanina G Salgado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urban ecosystems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Investigation of Epistemic Equity in Urban Green Space and Mental Health Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Understanding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Perception and Use of Urban Green Spaces in Korea.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia Laura MarconiUniversidad Maimónides, CONICET, Hidalgo 775, C1405BCJ, TE 4905-1249, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-8862-7390
Patricia Eleonora PerelmanMuseo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales-CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, CABA, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470(54) (11) 15.3575.9445, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Vanina G SalgadoDivisión Plantas Vasculares, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales-CONICET, CABA, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470 (54) (11) 15.3575.9445, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a deep impact on the way we perceive our world. This study explores its effect on Urban Green Space (UGS) perception in Buenos Aires City (CABA), Argentina. We provide a detailed overview of the distribution of UGS in CABA, along with socio-economic analysis and visitors' profile and perception before and during the restrictive measures adopted by the national authorities to contain the COVID-19 outbreak (July to December of 2020). We conducted a series of surveys based on open and closed questions. Before the pandemic, surveys were carried out in situ in eight parks of six districts, randomly chosen. During the confinement, online surveys were conducted. According to our results, the mean UGS density in CABA is 6.09 m

Indexed as

Biophilic citiesCOVID-19LandscapePerceptionUrban green space

Identifiers

PMID35095260
PMCPMC8790949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.