Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35095185›Full record

ArticleAcoustics Australia2022

The Influence of Face Masks on Verbal Communication in Persian in the Presence of Background Noise in Healthcare Staff.

Mohsen Aliabadi, Zahra Sadat Aghamiri, Maryam Farhadian, Masoud Shafiee Motlagh, Morteza Hamidi Nahrani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acoustics Australia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06053502 (The Filtering Facepiece Respirator Increases Inspiratory Time, But Does Not Change the Involvement of Breathing Compartments), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06053502 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Filtering Facepiece Respirator Increases Inspiratory Time, But Does Not Change the Involvement of Breathing Compartments

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of South BohemiaRan2023 to 2023Enrolled21ConditionsFace Mask Squeeze, Respiratory ComplicationArmsfiltering facepiece respirator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Effect of medical mask on voice in patients with dysphonia.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohsen AliabadiCenter of Excellence for Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 4171-65175, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7896-1379
Zahra Sadat AghamiriCenter of Excellence for Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 4171-65175, Hamadan, Iran.
Maryam FarhadianDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Masoud Shafiee MotlaghCenter of Excellence for Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 4171-65175, Hamadan, Iran.
Morteza Hamidi NahraniDepartment of Audiology, School of Rehabilitation, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearing face masks has resulted in verbal communication being more challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to investigate the effect of face masks on the speech comprehensibility of Persian nurses in healthcare settings. Twenty female nurses from the governmental hospitals randomly participated in an experiment on seven typical commercial face masks at two background noise levels. Nurses' speech intelligibility from a human talker when wearing each face mask was determined based on the speech discrimination score. The vocal effort of nurses wearing each face mask was determined based on the Borg CR10 scale. Based on the linear mixed model, the speech intelligibility of nurses from a human speaker wearing surgical masks, N95 masks, and a shield with face masks were approximately 10%, 20%, and 40-50% lower, respectively, than no-mask conditions (

Indexed as

Background noiseFace maskHealthcare settingSpeech intelligibilityVerbal communication

Identifiers

PMID35095185
PMCPMC8789375
OpenAlexW4210436619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.