ArticleThe International journal, advanced manufacturing technology2022
A novel AR remote collaborative platform for sharing 2.5D gestures and gaze.
Article in The International journal, advanced manufacturing technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Viewpoint-Controllable Telepresence: A Robotic-Arm-Based Mixed-Reality Telecollaboration System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Challenges in Implementing Low-Latency Holographic-Type Communication Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although sharing gestures and gaze can improve AR remote collaboration, most current systems only enable collaborators to share 2D or 3D gestures, and the unimodal HCI interface remains dominant. To address this problem, we describe a novel remote collaborative platform based on 2.5D gestures and gaze (2.5DGG), which supports an expert who collaborates with a worker (e.g., during assembly or training tasks). We investigate the impact of sharing the remote site's 2.5DGG using spatial AR (SAR) remote collaboration in manufacturing. Compared to other systems, there is a key advantage that it can provide more natural and intuitive multimodal interaction based on 2.5DGG. We track the remote experts' gestures and eye gaze using Leap Motion and aGlass, respectively, in a VR space displaying the live video stream of the local physical workspace and visualize them onto the local work scenario by a projector. The results of an exploratory user study demonstrate that 2.5DGG has a clear difference in performance time and collaborative experience, and it is better than the traditional one.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.