Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35095102›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2022

The stepwise process of integrating a genetic counsellor into primary care.

Caitlin Slomp, Emily Morris, GenCOUNSEL Study, Morgan Price, Alison M Elliott, Jehannine Austin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nonadherence to guidelines for genetic testing in families with ovarian cancer shows racial bias.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Preparing for the unexpected: Recommendations for returning secondary findings in late-stage cancer care.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caitlin SlompDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Emily MorrisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
GenCOUNSEL Study
Morgan PriceDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alison M ElliottDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9896-1314
Jehannine AustinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. jehannine.austin@ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0338-7055

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic services have historically been housed in tertiary care, requiring referral, which can present access barriers. While integrating genetics into primary care could facilitate access, many primary care physicians lack genomics expertise. Integrating genetic counsellors (GCs) into primary care could theoretically address these issues, but little is known about how to do this effectively. To understand and describe the process of integrating a GC into a multidisciplinary primary care setting, we qualitatively explored the perceptions, attitudes and reactions of existing team members prior to, and after the introduction of a GC. Semi-structured interviews were conducted immediately prior to (T1), and 9 months after (T2), the GC joining the clinic. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed concurrently with data collection using interpretive description. Twenty-four interviews were conducted with 17 participants (13 at T1, 11 at T2). Participants described several distinct, progressive stages of interaction with the GC: Disinterest or Resistance, Pre-Collaboration, Initial Collaboration, and Effective Collaboration/Integration of the GC into the team. At each stage, specific needs had to be met in order to advance to the next stage of collaboration. A variety of barriers and facilitators attended movement between different stages of the model. The Stepwise Process of Integration Model describes the process through which primary care staff and clinicians integrate a GC into their practice. The insight provided by this model could be used to facilitate more effective integration of GCs into other primary care settings.

Indexed as

CounselorsHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID35095102
PMCPMC8801315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.