Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35094598›Full record

ReviewThe Annals of pharmacotherapy2022

Antiplatelet Use in Ischemic Stroke.

Marharyta Kamarova, Sheharyar Baig, Hamish Patel, Kimberley Monks, Mohammed Wasay, Ali Ali, Jessica Redgrave, Arshad Majid, Simon M Bell

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Assessment and Density Functional Theory of Bioactive Compounds ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. [Colchicine-Phoenix from the ashes].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marharyta KamarovaDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8733-0050
Sheharyar BaigDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Hamish PatelDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6313-0185
Kimberley MonksDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Mohammed WasayDepartment of Neurology, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ali AliDepartment of Medicine for the Elderly, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Jessica RedgraveDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Arshad MajidDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Simon M BellDepartment of Clinical Neurology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2781-6478
Royal Hallamshire Hospital · GBAga Khan University · PK

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/R005923/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA literature review of antiplatelet agents for primary and secondary stroke prevention, including mechanism of action, cost, and reasons for lack of benefit. DATA SOURCES: Articles were gathered from MEDLINE, Cochrane Reviews, and PubMed databases (1980-2021). Abstracts from scientific meetings were considered. Search terms included ischemic stroke, aspirin, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, ticagrelor, cilostazol, prasugrel, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: English-language original and review articles were evaluated. Guidelines from multiple countries were reviewed. Articles were evaluated independently by 2 authors. DATA SYNTHESIS: An abundance of evidence supports aspirin and clopidogrel use for secondary stroke prevention. In the acute phase (first 21 days postinitial stroke), these medications have higher efficacy for preventing further stroke when combined, but long-term combination therapy is associated with higher hemorrhage rates. Antiplatelet treatment failure is influenced by poor adherence and genetic polymorphisms. Antiplatelet agents such as cilostazol may provide extra benefit over clopidogrel and aspirin, in certain racial groups, but further research in more diverse ethnic populations is needed. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review presents the data available on the use of different antiplatelet agents poststroke. Dual therapy, recurrence after initiation of secondary preventative therapy, and areas for future research are discussed.

conclusionsAlthough good evidence exists for the use of certain antiplatelet agents postischemic stroke, there are considerable opportunities for future research to investigate personalized therapies. These include screening patients for platelet polymorphisms that confer antiplatelet resistance and for randomized trials including more racially diverse populations.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeAspirinCilostazolClopidogrelDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAspirinCilostazolClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitorsantiplateletsaspirincilostazolclopidogrelprasugrelstroketicagrelorticlopidine

Identifiers

PMID35094598
PMCPMC9393649
OpenAlexW4210356038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.