ArticleNursing open2022
Healthcare professionals' perceptions of digital health competence: A qualitative descriptive study.
Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patients' Experiences of Healthcare Professionals' Competence in Digital Counselling in Healthcare Settings-A Qualitative Systematic Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Pooled it
- Nurse-Delivered Telehealth in Home-Based Palliative Care: Integrative Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Electronic Medication Reconciliation Tools Aimed at Healthcare Professionals to Support Medication Reconciliation: a Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2023Pooled it
- eHealth literacy among hospital health care providers: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- The global effect of digital health technologies on health workers' competencies and health workplace: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and lexical-based and sentence-based meta-analysis.The Lancet. Digital health · 2023Pooled it
- Patients' and Clinicians' Experiences Using a Real-Time Remote Monitoring System for Chemotherapy Symptom Management (ASyMS): Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Trial
- Profiling Healthcare Professionals' Digital Health Competence and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Exploratory Assessment of the Internal Structure of the Spanish Version of the Persenius Scale for Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Units: A Cross-Sectional Psychometric Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical educators' perspectives about use of digital tools and Challenges in their Use in clinical teaching and patient care: A qualitative study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- First the relationship, then the technology: Healthcare professionals' perceptions on how digital health solutions impact the interaction with patients.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of Digital Counselling: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Revising the TIGER 2018 Health Informatics Competency Framework: Updated Core Competency Areas for Nurses in a Digital Health Era.Methods of information in medicine · 2026Article
- Digital health literacy and caring behaviours among Turkish hospital nurses: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Expanding Telehealth Use for Older Adults Across the Cancer Control Continuum: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Future Training and Competency Needs in Hospital-at-Home Care: A Mixed-Methods Study From the Perspective of Healthcare Administrators and Managers.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward chemotherapy resistance among oncologists: a multinational cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Computer self-efficacy and technostress as independent predictors of job burnout among community healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Community pharmacists' perspectives on E-pharmacy: an imminent threat or an opportunity in disguise?Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Mind the gap: an evidence gap analysis of digital literacy within public health systems in the European Union using two different frameworks.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
AIMS AND
objectivesThis study aims to provide insight into healthcare professionals' lived experiences of digital health competence with the objective of improving the knowledge of how digital health competence is perceived by healthcare professionals.
backgroundHealthcare professionals need to adjust to the digital era to provide quality and ethical care. Previous research has rarely adopted a healthcare professional's standpoint to describe their perceptions of digital health competence, even though their perspective in how new care practices are designed and implemented is vital.
designA qualitative descriptive study.
methodsHealthcare professionals (nurses and allied health professionals) from versatile healthcare settings were recruited for individual semi-structured interviews in Sweden (n = 5) and Finland (n = 15) (spring 2019-summer 2020). Purposive and convenience sampling was used. Participants' backgrounds were in the public and private sectors. The interviews were transcribed for inductive content analysis. The SRQR guideline guided the study process.
resultsHealthcare professionals' perceptions of digital health competence are connected to competence to provide patient-centric care through digital channels, using technology and digital health systems, interacting with the patient through digital means, evaluating what digital health is and combining digital and traditional methods. Professionals' perceptions of their own digital health competence were divided, with the participants either reporting sufficient competence or perceiving a lack of skills in some specific areas.
conclusionsHealthcare professionals' perceptions of digital health competence focus on the ability to provide patient-centric care by evaluating the need and possibilities for using digital health services jointly with more traditional methods. This study provides a sound basis for digital health research, but future studies should focus on elucidating factors which affect digital health competence and competence development. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results of this study can guide healthcare practices and digital health implementation, as well as function as a basis for instrument or theory development. Health care and nursing leaders should enable the resources to hybrid practices in patient-centric care provision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.