Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35094493›Full record

ArticleNursing open2022

Healthcare professionals' perceptions of digital health competence: A qualitative descriptive study.

Erika Jarva, Anne Oikarinen, Janicke Andersson, Anna-Maria Tuomikoski, Maria Kääriäinen, Merja Meriläinen, Kristina Mikkonen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
40.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Erika JarvaResearch Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6860-4319
Anne OikarinenResearch Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3509-8912
Janicke AnderssonCenter for Research on Welfare, Health and Sports, Academy of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
Anna-Maria TuomikoskiOulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland.
Maria KääriäinenResearch Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Merja MeriläinenMedical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Kristina MikkonenResearch Unit of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4355-3428
Oulu University of Applied Sciences · FIOulu University Hospital · FIFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIHalmstad University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesThis study aims to provide insight into healthcare professionals' lived experiences of digital health competence with the objective of improving the knowledge of how digital health competence is perceived by healthcare professionals.

backgroundHealthcare professionals need to adjust to the digital era to provide quality and ethical care. Previous research has rarely adopted a healthcare professional's standpoint to describe their perceptions of digital health competence, even though their perspective in how new care practices are designed and implemented is vital.

designA qualitative descriptive study.

methodsHealthcare professionals (nurses and allied health professionals) from versatile healthcare settings were recruited for individual semi-structured interviews in Sweden (n = 5) and Finland (n = 15) (spring 2019-summer 2020). Purposive and convenience sampling was used. Participants' backgrounds were in the public and private sectors. The interviews were transcribed for inductive content analysis. The SRQR guideline guided the study process.

resultsHealthcare professionals' perceptions of digital health competence are connected to competence to provide patient-centric care through digital channels, using technology and digital health systems, interacting with the patient through digital means, evaluating what digital health is and combining digital and traditional methods. Professionals' perceptions of their own digital health competence were divided, with the participants either reporting sufficient competence or perceiving a lack of skills in some specific areas.

conclusionsHealthcare professionals' perceptions of digital health competence focus on the ability to provide patient-centric care by evaluating the need and possibilities for using digital health services jointly with more traditional methods. This study provides a sound basis for digital health research, but future studies should focus on elucidating factors which affect digital health competence and competence development. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The results of this study can guide healthcare practices and digital health implementation, as well as function as a basis for instrument or theory development. Health care and nursing leaders should enable the resources to hybrid practices in patient-centric care provision.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansPalliative CarePatient CareQualitative Researchcompetencecontent analysisdescriptive studydigital healthhealth personnelnursesperceptionstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35094493
PMCPMC8859079
OpenAlexW4210800647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.