ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2022
Evaluation of environmental conditions as a decontamination approach for SARS-CoV-2 when applied to common library, archive and museum-related materials.
Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-Enhanced Tools and Strategies for Airborne Disease Prevention in Cultural Heritage Sites.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Associations between meteorological factors and COVID-19: a global scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Evaluation of steam heat as a decontamination approach for SARS-CoV-2 when applied to common transit-related materials.Journal of applied microbiology · 2023Article
- Efficacy of chemical disinfectants against SARS-CoV-2 on high-touch surface materials.Journal of applied microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation of environmental conditions as a decontamination approach for SARS-CoV-2 when applied to common library, archive and museum-related materials.Journal of applied microbiology · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of formaldehyde in various soil types as a wide area decontamination approach for Bacillus anthracis spores.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of ambient or altered environmental conditions on the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 applied to materials common in libraries, archives and museums. METHODS AND
resultsPorous and non-porous materials (e.g. paper, plastic protective book cover) were inoculated with approximately 1 × 10
conclusionsSARS-CoV-2 at ambient conditions resulted in the inactivation of virus below limit of quantitation (LOQ) for all materials by Day 8. Warmer temperatures, for a subset of materials, increased SARS-CoV-2 inactivation, and all were <LOQ by Day 3. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These results provide information for the library, archives and museum community regarding the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2, showing that inactivation is possible using prescribed environmental conditions and is a potential method of decontamination for items not compatible with common liquid disinfectants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.