ArticleMedical physics2022
General and custom deep learning autosegmentation models for organs in head and neck, abdomen, and male pelvis.
Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of neural network algorithms in skull fracture detection on CT scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Emergency radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Deep learning algorithm performance in contouring head and neck organs at risk: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2023Pooled it
- Patient-specific fine-tuning of a self-distilled transformer model for normal tissue segmentation in abdominal magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Workflow to detect exceeded dose constraints in pancreatic stereotactic body irradiation after intrafraction motion during magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy using a deep learning-refined contour propagation tool.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Theranostics Dosimetry for Cancer Therapy: a Review.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- Evaluating the dosimetric impact of deep-learning-based auto-segmentation in prostate cancer radiotherapy: Insights into real-world clinical implementation and inter-observer variability.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Comparison of Vendor-Pretrained and Custom-Trained Deep Learning Segmentation Models for Head-and-Neck, Breast, and Prostate Cancers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Hu similarity coefficient: a clinically oriented metric to evaluate contour accuracy in radiation therapy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Based Autosegmentation of Organs at Risk in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Advances in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based automatic contour quality assurance for auto-segmented abdominal MR-Linac contours.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- XIOSIS: An X-Ray-Based Intra-Operative Image-Guided Platform for Oncology Smart Material Delivery.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Accurate object localization facilitates automatic esophagus segmentation in deep learning.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Deep learning and atlas-based models to streamline the segmentation workflow of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Radiotherapy Contouring and Planning to Improve Global Access to Cancer Care.JCO global oncology · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence research in radiation oncology: a practical guide for the clinician on concepts and methods.BJR open · 2024Review
- Deep learning based automatic contour refinement for inaccurate auto-segmentation in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Stress-testing pelvic autosegmentation algorithms using anatomical edge cases.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Deep learning auto-segmentation on multi-sequence magnetic resonance images for upper abdominal organs.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Computational approaches for the reconstruction of optic nerve fibers along the visual pathway from medical images: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- Validation of clinical acceptability of deep-learning-based automated segmentation of organs-at-risk for head-and-neck radiotherapy treatment planning.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo reduce workload and inconsistencies in organ segmentation for radiation treatment planning, we developed and evaluated general and custom autosegmentation models on computed tomography (CT) for three major tumor sites using a well-established deep convolutional neural network (DCNN).
methodsFive CT-based autosegmentation models for 42 organs at risk (OARs) in head and neck (HN), abdomen (ABD), and male pelvis (MP) were developed using a full three-dimensional (3D) DCNN architecture. Two types of deep learning (DL) models were separately trained using either general diversified multi-institutional datasets or custom well-controlled single-institution datasets. To improve segmentation accuracy, an adaptive spatial resolution approach for small and/or narrow OARs and a pseudo scan extension approach, when CT scan length is too short to cover entire organs, were implemented. The performance of the obtained models was evaluated based on accuracy and clinical applicability of the autosegmented contours using qualitative visual inspection and quantitative calculation of dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA), and time efficiency.
resultsThe five DL autosegmentation models developed for the three anatomical sites were found to have high accuracy (DSC ranging from 0.8 to 0.98) for 74% OARs and marginally acceptable for 26% OARs. The custom models performed slightly better than the general models, even with smaller custom datasets used for the custom model training. The organ-based approaches improved autosegmentation accuracy for small or complex organs (e.g., eye lens, optic nerves, inner ears, and bowels). Compared with traditional manual contouring times, the autosegmentation times, including subsequent manual editing, if necessary, were substantially reduced by 88% for MP, 80% for HN, and 65% for ABD models.
conclusionsThe obtained autosegmentation models, incorporating organ-based approaches, were found to be effective and accurate for most OARs in the male pelvis, head and neck, and abdomen. We have demonstrated that our multianatomical DL autosegmentation models are clinically useful for radiation treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.