Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35094358›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Selection of Cancer Stem Cell-Targeting Agents Using Bacteriophage Display.

Austin R Prater, Susan L Deutscher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Austin R PraterHarry S. Truman Veterans Memorial Hospital and Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. deutschers@missouri.edu.
Susan L DeutscherHarry S. Truman Veterans Memorial Hospital and Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing need to develop tumor targeting agents for aggressive cancers. Aggressive cancers frequently relapse and are resistant to various therapies. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are believed to be the cause of relapse and the aggressive nature of many cancers. Targeting CSCs could lead to novel diagnostic and treatment options. Bacteriophage (phage) display is a powerful tool developed by George Smith in 1985 to aid in the discovery of CSC targeting agents. Phage display selections are typically performed in vitro against an immobilized target. There are inherent disadvantages with this technique that can be circumvented by performing phage display selections in vivo. However, in vivo phage display selections present new challenges. A combination of both in vitro and in vivo selections, however, can take advantage of both selection methods. In this chapter, we discuss in detail how to isolate a CSC like population of cells from an aggressive cancer cell line, perform in vivo and in vitro phage display selections against the CSCs, and then characterize the resulting phage/peptides for further use as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesNeoplasmsCell Surface Display TechniquesHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsPeptide LibraryPeptide LibraryBacteriophageBiomarkersCancer stem cellsCharacterization/target validationPeptide-based tumor -targetingScreening

Identifiers

PMID35094358
OpenAlexW4210795448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.