Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35094352›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Natural Polymer-Based Micronanostructured Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Sara Katebifar, Devina Jaiswal, Michael R Arul, Sanja Novak, Jonathan Nip, Ivo Kalajzic, Swetha Rudraiah, Sangamesh G Kumbar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sara KatebifarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Devina JaiswalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA.
Michael R ArulDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Sanja NovakDepartment of Reconstructive Sciences, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Jonathan NipDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Ivo KalajzicDepartment of Reconstructive Sciences, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Swetha RudraiahDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Sangamesh G KumbarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. kumbar@uchc.edu.
UConn Health · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Saint Joseph · USWestern New England University · US

Funding

Biodegradable Matrices for Bone HealingR01EB020640 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI KUMBAR, SANGAMESH GURAPPA, YU, XIAOJUN · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although bone tissue allografts and autografts aremoften used as a regenerative tissue during the bone healing, their availability, donor site morbidity, and immune response to grafted tissue are limiting factors their more common usage. Tissue engineered implants, such as acellular or cellular polymeric structures, can be an alternative solution. A variety of scaffold fabrication techniques including electrospinning, particulate leaching, particle sintering, and more recently 3D printing have been used to create scaffolds with interconnected pores and mechanical properties for tissue regeneration. Simply combining particle sintering and molecular self-assembly to create porous microstructures with imbued nanofibers to produce micronanostructures for tissue regeneration applications. Natural polymers like polysaccharides, proteins and peptides of plant or animal origin have gained significant attention due to their assured biocompatibility in tissue regeneration. However, majority of these polymers are water soluble and structures derived from them are in the form of hydrogels and require additional stabilization via cross-linking. For bone healing applications scaffolds are required to be strong, and support attachment, proliferation and differentiation of osteoprogenitors into osteoblasts. Our ongoing work utilizes plant polysaccharide cellulose derivatives and collagen to create mechanically stable and bioactive micronanostructured scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Scaffold microstructure is essentially solvent sintered cellulose acetate (CA) microspheres in the form of a negative template for trabecular bone with defined pore and mechanical properties. Collagen nanostructures are imbued into the 3D environment of CA scaffolds using collagen molecular self-assembly principles. The resultant CA-collagen micronanostructures provide the benefits of combined polymers and serve as an alternative material platform to many FDA approved polyesters. Our ongoing studies and published work confirm improved osteoprogenitor adhesion, proliferation, migration, differentiation, extracellular matrix (ECM) secretion in promoting bone healing. In this chapter we will provide a detailed protocol on the creation of micronanostructured CA-collagen scaffolds and their characterization for bone tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells.

Indexed as

NanofibersTissue EngineeringAnimalsBone and BonesBone RegenerationPolymersTissue ScaffoldsPolymersBoneCelluloseCollagenMesenchymal Stem CellsMicronanostructuresNanofibersNatural PolymersRegenerative MedicineScaffoldsTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID35094352
OpenAlexW4210510830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.