SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2022
Salted fish and processed foods intake and nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, signaling pathways, clinical features, diagnosis, and management.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Synergistic carcinogenesis of the nasopharyngeal microbiome and Epstein-Barr virus: mechanisms of metabolic reprogramming and immune evasion.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Food-Borne Chemical Carcinogens and the Evidence for Human Cancer Risk.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to analyze whether the consumption of salted fish and processed foods increases the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by analyzing the relevant case-control or cohort design.
methodsMajor databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched to conduct related studies. In addition, Newcastle-Ottawa scale was employed for assessing the quality of articles. Random-effect model was utilized for meta-analysis. Total relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated.
resultsDose response showed a consistent linear relationship between the intake of salted fish and processed foods and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. In salted fish, the summary RR was 1.23 (1.04-1.47) for low intake and 1.45 (1.19-1.76) for high intake. For processed meat, low intake was 1.33 (1.09-1.62) and high intake was 1.65 (1.35-2.02). Low intake of processed vegetables was 1.28 (1.05-1.55) and high intake was 1.45 (1.17 -1.79) for high intake. Significant heterogeneity existed in all data but decreased in some subgroups after subgroup analysis.
conclusionSalted fish and processed foods are risk factors for increasing nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but they have different risk characteristics due to different intakes, different stages, and different types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.