Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35094119›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Deep learning analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography to determine histoprognostic factors of malignant breast tumours.

Caroline Dominique, Françoise Callonnec, Anca Berghian, Diana Defta, Pierre Vera, Romain Modzelewski, Pierre Decazes

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline DominiqueDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Centre, Rouen, France.
Françoise CallonnecDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Centre, Rouen, France.
Anca BerghianDepartment of Pathology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Centre, Rouen, France.
Diana DeftaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Centre, Rouen, France.
Pierre VeraDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Centre, Rouen, France.
Romain ModzelewskiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Centre, Rouen, France.
Pierre DecazesDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Henri Becquerel Cancer Centre, Rouen, France. pierre.decazes@chb.unicancer.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5323-9910
Laboratoire d'Informatique, du Traitement de l'Information et des Systèmes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate if a deep learning model can be used to characterise breast cancers on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM).

methodsThis retrospective mono-centric study included biopsy-proven invasive cancers with an enhancement on CESM. CESM images include low-energy images (LE) comparable to digital mammography and dual-energy subtracted images (DES) showing tumour angiogenesis. For each lesion, histologic type, tumour grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, HER-2 status, Ki-67 proliferation index, and the size of the invasive tumour were retrieved. The deep learning model used was a CheXNet-based model fine-tuned on CESM dataset. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated for the different models: images by images and then by majority voting combining all the incidences for one tumour.

resultsIn total, 447 invasive breast cancers detected on CESM with pathological evidence, in 389 patients, which represented 2460 images analysed, were included. Concerning the ER, the deep learning model on the DES images had an AUC of 0.83 with the image-by-image analysis and of 0.85 for the majority voting. For the triple-negative analysis, a high AUC was observable for all models, in particularity for the model on LE images with an AUC of 0.90 for the image-by-image analysis and 0.91 for the majority voting. The AUC for the other histoprognostic factors was lower.

conclusionDeep learning analysis on CESM has the potential to determine histoprognostic tumours makers, notably estrogen receptor status, and triple-negative receptor status. KEY POINTS: • A deep learning model developed for chest radiography was adapted by fine-tuning to be used on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. • The adapted models allowed to determine for invasive breast cancers the status of estrogen receptors and triple-negative receptors. • Such models applied to contrast-enhanced spectral mammography could provide rapid prognostic and predictive information.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningContrast MediaFemaleHumansMammographyReceptors, EstrogenRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaReceptors, EstrogenBreast neoplasmsDeep learningMammographyNeovascularizationPathologic

Identifiers

PMID35094119
PMCPMC8800426
OpenAlexW4210554133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.