Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35094110›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2022

YouTube as a source of information for water treatments.

Fulya Demircioğlu Güneri, Fatma Begüm Erol Forestier, Romain J Forestier, Fatih Karaarslan, Ersin Odabaşi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fulya Demircioğlu GüneriDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey. fuliad@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2469-0774
Fatma Begüm Erol ForestierCentre de Recherce Rhumatologique Et Termal, Aix Les Bains, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1569-2260
Romain J ForestierCentre de Recherce Rhumatologique Et Termal, Aix Les Bains, France.
Fatih KaraarslanDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-5887
Ersin OdabaşiDepartment of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the quality and reliability of YouTube videos as a source of information in water treatments. We searched videos on YouTube ( www.youtube.com ) using the following keywords: "health resort medicine," "spa treatment," "spa therapy," "hydrotherapy," "thermal medicine," "balneology," and "balneotherapy" on June 17th, 2021. The global quality scale (GQS) was used to evaluate the quality of the videos. The assessment of reliability was evaluated using the modified DISCERN tool. Some other video parameters and sources of the videos were also recorded. One hundred twenty-one (121) videos were analyzed. The most common video source was advertisement (46.3%). GQS and modified DISCERN median scores were generally low. They were superior for "hydrotherapy" and "balneotherapy" and were also higher in videos uploaded by health-related persons or organizations (physicians, health-related professionals, and health-related websites). A statistically significant positive correlation was found between investigated parameters (like view ratio, number of likes, video power index, video length) and GQS. Only video length was correlated with modified DISCERN for investigated parameters. The median video power index scores were statistically higher for "spa therapy" and "spa treatment." The YouTube content linked with water treatments has poor quality and reliability most of time. The hydrotherapy and balneotherapy keywords have the best quality and reliability.We think that designers of water treatment videos should involve health professionals more often so that the content of their video will better explain the details of medical conditions or interventions.The scientific experts should ensure a consensus in terminology to straighten the awareness of water treatments for patients and physicians.

Indexed as

Social MediaWater PurificationHumansInformation DisseminationReproducibility of ResultsVideo RecordingBalneotherapyHealth resort medicineSpa therapyWater treatmentsYouTube

Identifiers

PMID35094110
PMCPMC8800846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.