ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022
Identification of a Subset of Stage I Colorectal Cancer Patients With High Recurrence Risk.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated bioinformatics and experimental validation identify CCDC78 as a prognostic biomarker in colon adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Focal Adhesion Kinase Intersects With the BRD4-MYC Axis and YAP1 to Drive Tumor Cell Growth, Phenotypic Plasticity, Stemness, and Metastatic Potential in Colorectal Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Autophagy, molecular chaperones, and unfolded protein response as promoters of tumor recurrence.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA challenge in early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) is identifying biomarkers that predict an increased risk for recurrence. A potential clinically adaptable biomarker is focal adhesion kinase (FAK), a tyrosine kinase that promotes invasion and metastasis.
methodsAn initial, single-institution, 298-patient cohort with all stages of CRC and long-term follow-up was assessed for FAK with tissue microarrays using immunohistochemistry. FAK expression was scored and dichotomized into high and low. Subsequently, a validation cohort of 517 early-stage CRCs from a separate institution was evaluated. All statistical tests were 2-sided.
resultsFAK overexpression did not correlate with any known histologic feature and was an early event in CRC, increasing from normal colon to stage I, and stage I to II, but not different at higher stages. High FAK was associated with decreased 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) among stage I patients (70.2% for high FAK vs 94.1% for low, P = .02), but not among higher stages in the initial cohort. The same finding was seen in the validation cohort (73.1% for high FAK vs 93.1% for low, P = .004). Multivariable survival analysis for stage I patients showed only two statistically significant factors predicting RFS: FAK (hazard ratio = 5.27, 95% confidence interval = 1.81 to 15.33, P = .002) and perineural invasion (hazard ratio = 7.38, 95% confidence interval = 1.01 to 53.96, P = .049). FAK was the only statistically significant factor in multivariable analysis across RFS, overall, and disease-specific survivals.
conclusionsHigh FAK expression identified a subset of stage I CRC patients with high incidence of recurrence and reduced survival, suggesting that FAK has important prognostic value. These patients would immediately benefit from more rigorous surveillance protocols for recurrent disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.