Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35094013›Full record

SynthesisJournal of human hypertension2022

Renal denervation for atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Khaled Nawar, Ahmed Mohammad, Edward J Johns, Mohammed H Abdulla

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of human hypertension, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Renal Denervation in Cardiovascular Diseases: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Expanding Applications.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Neurocardiac Axis Physiology and Clinical Applications.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024
    Review
  13. Functional insights into the cardiorenal syndrome.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Long-term safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation in atrial fibrillation: 3-year results of the AFFORD study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2023
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Khaled Nawar *School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ahmed Mohammad *School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Edward J JohnsDepartment of Physiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Mohammed H AbdullaDepartment of Physiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. m.abdulla@ucc.ie.ORCID 0000-0001-5496-5017
University College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aims to compare clinical outcomes following renal denervation (RDN) in hypertensive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Three online databases were searched (MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed) for literature related to outcomes of RDN on hypertension and AF, between January 1, 2010, and June 1, 2021. Where possible, risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) were combined using a random effects model. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Seven trials were included that assessed the effect of adding RDN to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with hypertension and AF. A total of 711 patients (329 undergoing PVI + RDN and 382 undergoing PVI alone), with an age range of 56 ± 6 to 68 ± 9 years, were included. Pooled analysis showed a significant lowering of AF recurrence in the PVI + RDN (31.3%) group compared to the PVI-only (52.9%) group (p < 0.00001). Pooled analysis of patients with resistant hypertension showed a significant mean reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-9.42 mm Hg, p = 0.05), but not diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (-4.11 mm Hg, p = 0.16) in favor of PVI + RDN. Additionally, the pooled analysis showed that PVI + RDN significantly improved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (+10.2 mL/min per 1.73 m

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationHypertensionHumansRecurrenceRenal ArterySympathectomyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35094013
PMCPMC9553644
OpenAlexW4210703310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.