Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35093747›Full record

ArticleJournal of hazardous materials2022

In Vitro characterization of the endocrine disrupting effects of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) on the human androgen receptor.

Phum Tachachartvanich, Ettayapuram Ramaprasad Azhagiya Singam, Kathleen A Durkin, J David Furlow, Martyn T Smith, Michele A La Merrill

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hazardous materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Impact of Forever Chemicals on Protein Structure and Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Phum TachachartvanichDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis 95616, CA, USA; Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Chulabhorn Research Institute, Bangkok 10210, Thailand.
Ettayapuram Ramaprasad Azhagiya SingamMolecular Graphics and Computation Facility, College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley 94720, CA, USA.
Kathleen A DurkinMolecular Graphics and Computation Facility, College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley 94720, CA, USA.
J David FurlowDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis 95616, CA, USA.
Martyn T SmithDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley 94720, CA, USA.
Michele A La MerrillDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis 95616, CA, USA. Electronic address: mlamerrill@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, Davis · USChulabhorn Research Institute · TH

Funding

Training CoreP42ES004705 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MCHALE, CLIONA · 1987 to 2025
$74.6M
High Performance Computing Cluster for Public Health Driven Molecular Science - Core FacilityS10OD023532 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI DURKIN, KATHLEEN A · 2017 to 2017
$434k
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004705NIH HHS S10 OD023532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are used extensively in a broad range of industrial applications and consumer products. While a few legacy PFASs have been voluntarily phased out, over 5000 PFASs have been produced as replacements for their predecessors. The potential endocrine disrupting hazards of most emerging PFASs have not been comprehensively investigated. In silico molecular docking to the human androgen receptor (hAR) combined with machine learning techniques were previously applied to 5206 PFASs and predicted 23 PFASs bind the hAR. Herein, the in silico results were validated in vitro for the five candidate AR ligands that were commercially available. Three manufactured PFASs namely (9-(nonafluorobutyl)- 2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-1 H,5 H,11 H-pyrano[2,3-f]pyrido[3,2,1-ij]quinolin-11-one (NON), 2-(heptafluoropropyl)- 3-phenylquinoxaline (HEP), and 2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,5-nonafluoro-N-(4-nitrophenyl)pentanamide (NNN) elicited significant antiandrogenic effects at relatively low concentrations. We further investigated the mechanism of AR inhibition and found that all three PFASs inhibited AR transactivation induced by testosterone through a competitive binding mechanism. We then examined the antiandrogenic effects of these PFASs on AR expression and its responsive genes. Consistently, these PFASs significantly decreased the expression of PSA and FKBP5 and increased the expression of AR, similar to the effects elicited by a known competitive AR inhibitor, hydroxyflutamide. This suggests they are competitive antagonists of AR activity and western blot analysis revealed these PFASs decreased intracellular AR protein in androgen sensitive human prostate cancer cells. Hence, the findings presented here corroborate our published in silico approach and indicate these emerging PFASs may adversely affect the human endocrine system.

Indexed as

Endocrine DisruptorsFluorocarbonsAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsHumansMaleMolecular Docking SimulationReceptors, AndrogenAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsEndocrine DisruptorsFluorocarbonsReceptors, AndrogenAntiandrogensEndocrine disruptorsHuman androgen receptorPFASs

Identifiers

PMID35093747
PMCPMC9705075
OpenAlexW4206415617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.