ArticleMicrobes and infection2022
Application experience of a rapid nucleic acid detection system for COVID-19.
Article in Microbes and infection, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Brief Progress in Methods for Deciphering Protein-Protein Interaction Networks.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluation of three rapid assays for detecting Mycoplasma pneumoniae in nasopharyngeal specimens.AMB Express · 2024Article
- SMART: On-Site Rapid Detection of Nucleic Acid from Plants, Animals, and Microorganisms in under 25 Minutes.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Assay methods based on proximity-enhanced reactions for detecting non-nucleic acid molecules.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- A semi-quantitative upconversion nanoparticle-based immunochromatographic assay for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Performance comparison of two nucleic acid amplification systems for SARS-CoV-2 detection: A multi-center study.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
- Laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2: A review of the current literature and future perspectives.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Accurate Interpretation of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Detection by Immunochromatography.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is raging worldwide. The COVID-19 outbreak caused severe threats to the life and health of all humans caused by SARS-CoV-2. Clinically, there is an urgent need for an in vitro diagnostic product to detect SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid quickly. Under this background, commercial SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid POCT products came into being. However, how to choose these products and how to use these products in a standardized way have brought new puzzles to clinical laboratories. This paper focuses on evaluating the performance of these commercial SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid POCT products and helps the laboratory make the correct choice. At the same time, to standardize the use of this kind of product, this paper also puts forward corresponding suggestions from six elements of total quality management, namely, human, machine, material, method, environment, and measurement. In addition, this paper also puts forward some ideas on the future development direction of POCT products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.