Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35093484›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2022

Comparative analyses of IgG/IgA neutralizing effects induced by three COVID-19 vaccines against variants of concern.

Eliott Lafon, Michael Jäger, Angelika Bauer, Markus Reindl, Rosa Bellmann-Weiler, Doris Wilflingseder, Cornelia Lass-Flörl, Wilfried Posch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eliott LafonInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Michael JägerInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Angelika BauerClinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Markus ReindlClinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Rosa Bellmann-WeilerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Doris WilflingsederInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Cornelia Lass-FlörlInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Wilfried PoschInstitute of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: wilfried.posch@i-med.ac.at.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 33510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have directly compared virus-specific antibodies and their neutralizing capacity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) wild type (WT) and circulating variants of concern despite the reported high efficacy of messenger RNA (mRNA)- and vector-based vaccines.

objectiveWe assessed SARS-CoV-2 spike protein region 1 (S1)-specific antibodies of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and ChAdOx1 vaccinated as well as convalescent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We also determined the neutralization ability against SARS-CoV-2 WT and B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B1.1.7 E484K (Alpha-E484K), B.1.351 (Beta), and B.1.617.2 (Delta) variants.

methodsSerum samples of 107 fully vaccinated or convalescent individuals were analyzed for anti-SARS-CoV-2-S1 IgG and IgA as well as for total anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain Ig. Furthermore, neutralization capacity as 50% and 90% neutralization titer values against SARS-CoV-2 WT virus and circulating variants were determined.

resultsWe observed a robust IgG response in all participants; however, the highest titers were detected in mRNA-based vaccine recipients. In case of serum IgA responses, the difference between mRNA- and vector-based vaccines or convalescent patients was even more pronounced. Interestingly, all 3 vaccines could neutralize all tested variants of concern in addition to WT virus, but in some individuals, only low or no neutralization, especially against Alpha-E484K and the Delta variant, was detected.

conclusionOur study of the efficacy of various COVID-19 vaccines found that mRNA-1273 had the highest neutralization abilities compared to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1. COVID-19 convalescent patients demonstrated the most heterogeneous range of antibody titers and neutralization abilities, making it hard to assess protection. Furthermore, a significant positive relation between antibodies and the 50% neutralization titer values for immunized and convalescent individuals was determined.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GRNA, MessengerSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GRNA, MessengerSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2IgG and IgA antibodiesSARS-CoV-2vaccinesvariants of concernvirus neutralization

Identifiers

PMID35093484
PMCPMC8799473
OpenAlexW4210648973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.