Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35093266›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association2022

Process and strategies for patient engagement and outreach in the Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) community to promote clinical trial participation.

C Byrnes, M Botello-Harbaum, T Clemons, L Bailey, K M Valdes, V H Coleman-Cowger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

C ByrnesThe Emmes Company, LLC, 401 North Washington Street, Suite 700, Rockville, MD 20850. Electronic address: cbyrnes@emmes.com.
M Botello-HarbaumThe Emmes Company, LLC, 401 North Washington Street, Suite 700, Rockville, MD 20850. Electronic address: marbotel3@aol.com.
T ClemonsThe Emmes Company, LLC, 401 North Washington Street, Suite 700, Rockville, MD 20850. Electronic address: tclemons@emmes.com.
L BaileySickle Cell Consortium, Inc., P.O. Box 1195, Cumming, GA 30028. Electronic address: director@sicklecellconsortium.org.
K M ValdesNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Dr, Bethesda MD 20817. Electronic address: k.valdes4513@gmail.com.
V H Coleman-CowgerThe Emmes Company, LLC, 401 North Washington Street, Suite 700, Rockville, MD 20850. Electronic address: vcolemancowger@emmes.com.
Emmes (United States) · USApple (Israel) · ILNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Sickle Cell Disease Cure Initiative (SCDC)OT2HL142340 · NHLBI · THE EMMES COMPANY, LLC · PI COLEMAN-COWGER, VICTORIA HOPE · 2017 to 2024
$18.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL142340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common inherited blood disorder in the United States. The Cure Sickle Cell Initiative (CureSCi) was created by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) to improve the lives of people with SCD by accelerating the advancement of safe and promising genetic therapies, engaging the SCD community and healthcare providers, and encouraging collaboration among stakeholders. CureSCi is a collaborative, patient-focused research effort that includes patients at every level of the Initiative. Patient engagement is a key component, particularly during the development of clinical trials.

objectiveTo describe the processes and strategies utilized by the CureSCi to engage individuals living with SCD about genetic therapy clinical trials.

methodsThe CureSCi Patient Engagement team conducted nine Community Outreach visits in 2019, each of which was structured to include separate group interviews with patients and medical providers. A set of guidance questions was developed for each audience and the interviews lasted approximately 60 minutes.

resultsPatients were asked about their participation in a clinical trial, and approximately 50% had participated in a trial. SCD individuals reported trusting their medical provider to provide them with information relevant to trials. Medical providers emphasized the individual, family, and health aspects of SCD that warrant additional investigation. Providers reported barriers encountered by patients as transportation, childcare support, infertility, and trust in the healthcare system.

conclusionLessons learned from the community have helped to influence recommendations for clinical trial design and key messaging development for the Cure Sickle Cell Initiative.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellClinical Trials as TopicPatient ParticipationGenetic TherapyHumansUnited StatesClinical trialsCommunity outreachPatient engagementSickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID35093266
PMCPMC9058174
OpenAlexW4210406739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.