ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2022
Fetal therapies and trials for lysosomal storage diseases: a survey of attitudes of parents and patients.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04532047 (PEARL), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
PEARL (PrEnAtal Enzyme Replacement Therapy for Lysosomal Storage Disorders)
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prenatal Delivery of Enzyme Replacement Therapy to Fetuses Affected by Early-Onset Lysosomal Storage Diseases.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2025Review
- Advancing precision care in pregnancy through a treatable fetal findings list.American journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Ascending Vaginal Infection in Mice Induces Preterm Birth and Neonatal Morbidity.The American journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Parental perception of treatment options for mucopolysaccharidosis: a survey to bridge the gap for personalized medicine.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Intrauterine enzyme replacement therapies for lysosomal storage disorders: Current developments and promising future prospects.Prenatal diagnosis · 2023Review
- Acceptability of prenatal diagnosis and prenatal treatment of haemophilia using cell and gene therapies within US haemophilia community.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2023Article
- Prenatal Somatic Cell Gene Therapies: Charting a Path Toward Clinical Applications (Proceedings of the CERSI-FDA Meeting).Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Review
- Diagnosis and Emerging Treatment Strategies for Mucopolysaccharidosis VII (Sly Syndrome).Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) are inherited metabolic disorders that may lead to severe multi-organ disease. Current ERTs are limited by anti-drug antibodies, the blood-brain barrier, and early disease onset and progression before ERT is started. We have opened a phase I clinical trial of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for fetuses with LSDs (NCT04532047). We evaluated the attitudes of parents and patients with LSDs towards fetal clinical trials and therapies.
methodsA multidisciplinary team designed a survey which was distributed by five international patient advocacy groups. We collected patients' demographic, diagnostic, and treatment information. Associations between respondent characteristics and attitudes towards fetal therapies/trials were analyzed using multivariate ordinal logistic regression.
resultsThe survey was completed by 181 adults from 19 countries. The majority of respondents were mothers from the United States. The most common diseases were MPS1 (26%), MPS3 (19%), and infantile-onset Pompe (14%). Most patients (88%) were diagnosed after birth, at a median of 21 months. Altogether, 65% of participating patients and children of participants had received ERT, 27% a stem cell transplant, and 4% gene therapy. We found that half (49%) of respondents were unlikely to terminate a future affected pregnancy, 55% would enroll in a phase I clinical trial for fetal ERT, and 46% would enroll in a fetal gene therapy trial. Respondents who received postnatal ERT were significantly more likely enroll in a trial for fetal ERT or gene therapy (ERT OR 4.48, 95% CI 2.13-9.44, p < 0.0001; gene therapy OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.43-6.43, p = 0.0038). Respondents who used clinicaltrials.gov as a main source of information were more likely to choose to participate in a fetal trial (ERT OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.18-5.01, p = 0.016; gene therapy OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.27-6.46, p = 0.011).
conclusionsFamiliarity with postnatal ERT increased respondents' likelihood of pursuing fetal therapies. Families who use clinicaltrials.gov may be more receptive to innovative fetal treatments. The patient community has a favorable attitude towards fetal therapy; over half of respondents would enroll in a phase I clinical trial to assess the safety and efficacy of fetal ERT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.