Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35093066›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2022

Quality of life of women with breast cancer in a tertiary referral university hospital.

Jamilah Yusoff, Aniza Ismail, Mohd Rizal Abd Manaf, Fuad Ismail, Norlia Abdullah, Rohaizak Muhammad, Shahrun Niza Abdullah Suhaimi, Reena Rahayu Mat Zin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Health related quality of life of patients with breast cancer in Malaysia: evidence from EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-C30.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jamilah YusoffMinistry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Aniza IsmailFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. aniza@ppukm.ukm.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-4460
Mohd Rizal Abd ManafFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Fuad IsmailFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Norlia AbdullahFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Rohaizak MuhammadFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Shahrun Niza Abdullah SuhaimiFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Reena Rahayu Mat ZinFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
National University of Malaysia · MYMinistry of Health · MYUniversity Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · MY

Funding

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia GUP-2016-037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality of life (QoL) is one of the treatment outcome measures in patients with breast cancer. In this study, we measured the QoL of women with breast cancer at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC) and identified the associated factors. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2017 to December 2017 and involved female patients with breast cancer. The QoL scores and domains were determined using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L, and were presented as the utility value and visual analog scores, respectively.

resultsWe recruited a total of 173 women, aged 33-87 years. The median VA score was 80.00 (interquartile range [IQR] 70.00-90.00); the median utility value was 0.78 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.65-1.00. Women who did not take traditional medicine had a higher utility index score of 0.092 (95% CI 0.014-0.171), and women with household income of RM3000-5000 had a higher utility index score of 0.096 (95% CI 0.011-0.180).

conclusionTraditional medicine consumption and household income were significantly associated with lower QoL. The pain/discomfort domain was the worst affected QoL domain and was related to traditional medicine use and household income. Addressing pain management in patients with breast cancer and the other factors contributing to lower QoL may improve the QoL of breast cancer survivors in the future.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsQuality of LifeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care CentersBreast cancerQuality of lifeTertiary hospital

Identifiers

PMID35093066
PMCPMC8800330
OpenAlexW4210471444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.