ArticleBMC health services research2022
Reasons for non-participation in a self-care training program for diabetic patients: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing social participation in older adults with noncommunicable diseases: insights from system dynamics modeling.BMC public health · 2025Article
- From inequalities to solutions: an explanatory sequential study on type 2 diabetes health services utilization.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Challenges in implementing Indonesia's community-based chronic disease management program (Prolanis): A scoping review.AIMS public health · 2025Review
- Why healthcare providers are not vaccinated? A qualitative study during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Descriptive phenomenology study of the reasons for the low uptake of free health service package among type II diabetic patients.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Socio-economic determinants of attendance at diabetes self-management education program: using Andersen's behavioral model.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Challenges of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management From the Perspective of Patients: Conventional Content Analysis.Interactive journal of medical research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSelf-care behaviors in diabetic patients is considered an important factor for controlling the diabetes. Therefore, diabetic patients need training the self-care behaviors to control this disease. This study aims to investigate the reasons for diabetic patients' non-participation in a self-care training program.
methodThis qualitative study was carried out between 1 April to 1 July 2019. We used in-depth semi-structured interviews with 30 diabetic patients who did not participate in the self-care training program. Data analysis was conducted using content analysis with MAXQDA software.
findingsThe results of this study showed that there are 5 themes and 14 sub-themes for patients' non-participation in self-care training program. Themes included access; individual, familial and social factors; attitude and awareness; motivator factors and need Factors. Also sub-themes were physical access, time access, physical abilities, social-familial responsibilities, attitude to disease, attitude to education, attitude to health, awareness, incentive, communication, teaching methods, perceived risk, access to other educational resources and self-efficacy.
conclusionAccording to the results of this study, simple physical and time access, offering high-quality education, providing virtual and distant training, organizing and designing modern training methods can lead to increase participation in self-care training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.