Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35093038›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Insights on my future job: implementing near-peer shadowing program for operating room freshmen.

Mahboobeh Khabaz Mafinejad, Hamed Sarani, Azadeh Sayarifard, Daryoush Rostami, Fatemeh Shahbazi, Larry Gruppen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahboobeh Khabaz MafinejadHealth Professions Education Research Center, Education Development Center, Department of Medical Education, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed SaraniPregnancy Health Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR, Iran.
Azadeh SayarifardCenter for Academic and Health Policy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Daryoush RostamiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran.
Fatemeh ShahbaziDepartment of Community Medicine, School of Medicine Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Dr. Hesabi Square - Medical Sciences Campus, Zahedan, Iran. fatemehshahbazi@zaums.ir.ac.
Larry GruppenDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a main challenge in paramedical faculties of medical sciences, freshmen lose interest in their academic field of study and then job motivation. Lack of developed knowledge about their academic field and unfamiliarity with their future job's tasks and roles contribute to freshmen's job motivation loss. Various interventional programs have been implemented to improve students' job motivation by familiarizing them with their future job's duties and responsibilities.

methodsThis was one-group pretest-posttest design study in 2019-2020. Students grouped into pairs of a freshman (shadowee) with a senior (shadower) in a clinical setting during shadowing program. This program helps freshmen to comprehend and discover realities of their academic field and can help them change their perspectives regarding their future job's duties and responsibilities. The shadowees' main task was reflective observation on operating room events and interactions and to be active in the program, several tasks e.g., how to wear gloves, guns, and disinfect equipment were assigned to them exclusively under the supervision of senior students. The Hackman and Oldham's Job Diagnostic Survey (JDS) questionnaire and a novel Job Motivation Survey (JMS) questionnaire were distributed among participants.

resultsFifty freshmen majoring in operating room participated in the shadowing program from November 2019 to January 2020. Before and after the program, they completed Hackman and Oldham's job diagnostic survey and researcher-made job motivation survey questionnaires. Results were indicative of a significant difference in job diagnostic survey questionnaire score, where overall pre-test and post-test scores before and after the intervention were 57.78 (±9.78) and 68.58 (±5.02), respectively; the score difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Moreover, the overall pre-test and post-test scores of the job motivation survey questionnaire were 25.16 (± 9.75) and 39.80 (±5.18), respectively; this score difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

conclusionShadowing program improved freshmen's realistic perception of their future job's duties and responsibility, and hence enhancing their job motivation and job recognition. As future work, in various disciplines, further studies need to evaluate the impact of such interventional programs in providing early insights for freshmen as well as in providing guidance on their plans for education, and future job.

Indexed as

MotivationOperating RoomsForecastingHumansPeer GroupEarly exposureJob diagnosticJob motivationOperating roomShadowing

Identifiers

PMID35093038
PMCPMC8801118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.