Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092923›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2022

Bowel perforation due to chronic idiopathic megacolon: Case report and literature review.

Mauro Giambusso, Pietro Fransvea, Gilda Pepe, Gabriele Sganga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mauro GiambussoEmergency Surgery and Trauma - Fondazione Policlinico "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: maurogiambusso@gmail.com.
Pietro FransveaEmergency Surgery and Trauma - Fondazione Policlinico "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Gilda PepeEmergency Surgery and Trauma - Fondazione Policlinico "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele SgangaEmergency Surgery and Trauma - Fondazione Policlinico "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and importanceChronic idiopathic megacolon is a rare condition characterized by an irreversible distension of the colon in the absence of organic disease. The pathogenesis of this condition is still unclear and the data in literatures are not consistent. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of an 87-years-old woman affected by bowel perforation in chronic idiopathic megacolon. The patient underwent an emergency subtotal colectomy with terminal ileostomy. The postoperative was uneventful. At the histopathological examination, no organic cause of megacolon was found, so a diagnosis of idiopathic megacolon was done. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Idiopathic megacolon is difficult to diagnose due to the lack of specific clinical manifestations and pathological features. If not carefully investigated, can lead to severe complications such as perforation of the dilated bowel and subsequent peritonitis and sepsis, metabolic and electrolyte abnormalities. The protocols for management of IMC remains controversial. To achieve a good long-term outcome, early intervention is recommended.

conclusionEarly diagnosis of idiopathic megacolon is needed to perform the best therapeutic strategy and prevent complications, but further studies are needed.

Indexed as

Case reportChronicIdiopathicMegacolonPerforation

Identifiers

PMID35092923
PMCPMC8803594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.