Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092692›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2022

Quality of care at childbirth: Findings of IMAgiNE EURO in Italy during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Marzia Lazzerini, Benedetta Covi, Ilaria Mariani, Angela Giusti, Emanuelle Pessa Valente, IMAgiNE EURO Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care in childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Observational
  14. Women's assessment of the quality of hospital-based perinatal care by mode of birth in Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Observational
  15. Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth for migrant versus nonmigrant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 11 countries of the WHO European region.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  16. Rates of instrumental vaginal birth and cesarean and quality of maternal and newborn health care in private versus public facilities: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 16 countries.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Observational
  17. Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth in Luxembourg during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Quality of Informed Consent Practices around the Time of Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marzia LazzeriniInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8608-2198
Benedetta CoviInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7635-0654
Ilaria MarianiInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8260-4788
Angela GiustiNational Centre for Diseases Prevention and Health Promotion, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8695-7847
Emanuelle Pessa ValenteInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo" - WHO Collaborating Centre for Maternal and Child Health, Trieste, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4741-4628
IMAgiNE EURO Study Group
IRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInvestigate the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during childbirth in the first year of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, from the mothers' perspective, as key service users.

methodsWomen who gave birth in an Italian facility from March 1, 2020 to February 29, 2021 answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO Standard-based Quality Measures. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed.

resultsIn total, 4824 women were included, reporting heterogeneity of practices across regions: among 3981 women who underwent labour 78.4% (63.0%-92.0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 44.6% (28.9%-53.3%) had difficulties in attending routine antenatal visits, 36.3% (24.9%-61.1%) reported inadequate breastfeeding support, 39.2% (23.3%-62.2%) felt not involved in medical choices, 33.0% (23.9%-49.3%) experienced unclear communication from staff, 24.8% (15.9%-39.4%) were not always treated with dignity and 12.7% (10.1%-29.3%) reported abuses. Findings in the group of women who did not experience labour were substantially similar. Multivariate analyses confirmed a significant lower QMNC index for regions in southern Italy compared to North and Central regions.

conclusionMothers reported substantial inequities in the QMNC across Italian regions. Future studies should monitor QMNC over time. Meanwhile, actions to ensure high QMNC for all mothers and newborns across Italy are urgently required.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornItalyPandemicsParturitionPregnancyQuality of Health CarechildbirthCOVID-19European regionhospitalmaternalnewbornquality of carequestionnairesurvey

Identifiers

PMID35092692
PMCPMC9087757
OpenAlexW4210623878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.