Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092641›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

Virus viability in spiked swine bone marrow tissue during above-ground burial method and under in vitro conditions.

Rafael Ebling, Willian Pinto Paim, Justin Turner, Gary Flory, Jeremy Seiger, Caleb Whitcomb, Marta Remmenga, Matthew Vuolo, Akhilesh Ramachandran, Leslie Cole and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafael EblingDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Willian Pinto PaimDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Justin TurnerDepartment of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Ferguson College of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Gary FloryG.A. Flory Consulting, Mt. Crawford, Virginia, USA.
Jeremy SeigerEnvirotech Engineering & Consulting, Inc., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Caleb WhitcombOklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Marta RemmengaCenter for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Veterinary Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Matthew VuoloCenter for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Veterinary Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Akhilesh RamachandranMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Leslie ColeUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Field Operations, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Eduardo Furtado FloresSetor de Virologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5074-6025
Robert MiknisU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Services, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Becky BrewerUnited States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Field Operations, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Lori MillerUnited States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Veterinary Services, Strategy and Policy, Riverdale, Maryland, USA.
Keith BaileyMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Justin TalleyDepartment of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Ferguson College of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.
Fernando Vicosa BauermannDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3891-1152
Oklahoma State University · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USAtotech (United States) · USClinical Research Consulting · USOklahoma Department of Agriculture Food and Forestry · USUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BR

Funding

National Pork Board NPB19-222United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service AP19VSCEAH00C006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of high consequence animal diseases usually requires managing significant mortality. A desirable aspect of any carcass management method is the ability to contain and inactivate the target pathogen. The above-ground burial (AGB) technique was recently developed and proposed as an alternative carcass management method. Here, we investigate the tenacity of swinepox virus (SwPV), as a surrogate model for African swine fever virus (ASFV) in swine carcasses during the AGB process. For this, SwPV was inoculated intrafemorally in 90 adult swine carcasses, which were subsequently disposed under AGB conditions. Bone marrow samples were recovered periodically throughout 12 months and virus viability was assessed by virus isolation (VI), whereas the presence of SwPV DNA was evaluated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Additionally, an in vitro study assessed the inactivation rate of SwPV, Senecavirus A (SVA), and bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV). Viral suspensions were mixed with bone marrow material and maintained at 21-23°C for 30 days. Virus viability was assessed by VI and viral titration. In the field study, SwPV remained viable only in 11 (55%) bone marrow samples collected on day 7; only viral DNA (and not infectivity) was detected afterwards. SwPV inactivation was estimated to have occurred by day 11. The in vitro testing revealed a variable tenacity of the studied viruses. The viability period was estimated in 28, 80, and 118 days, respectively, for BVDV, SwPV, and SVA. Overall, these findings indicate that the AGB technique was effective in quickly inactivating SwPV. Additionally, the SwPV inactivation rate is comparable to ASFV under field studies and poses a potential model for preliminary ASFV inactivation studies with reduced biosecurity requirements. Moreover, this study contributes to understanding the inactivation kinetics of viruses under specific conditions, which is critical when designing and applying countermeasures in case of biosecurity breaches in sites managing animal mortality.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusPoxviridae InfectionsSwine DiseasesVirusesAnimalsBone MarrowBurialDNA, ViralMicrobial ViabilitySwineDNA, Viralbovine viral diarrhoea virusdepopulation | Large Scale Shallow Burial with CarbonSenecavirus Aswinepox virusvirus tenacity

Identifiers

PMID35092641
PMCPMC9790394
OpenAlexW4210401800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.