Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092566›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022

Efficacy and safety of app-based remote warfarin management during COVID-19-related lockdown: a retrospective cohort study.

Shaojun Jiang, Meina Lv, Zhiwei Zeng, Zongwei Fang, Mingrong Chen, Jiafen Qian, Tingting Wu, Wenjun Chen, Jinhua Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Communicating blood test results in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shaojun Jiang *Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Meina Lv *Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Zhiwei ZengDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Zongwei FangDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Mingrong ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Jiafen QianDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Tingting WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Wenjun ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Jinhua ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. pollyzhang2006@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5629-0348

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province 2018Y0037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the effectiveness, and safety of internet-based warfarin management during the pandemic. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared the safety and efficacy of online warfarin management using a smartphone app (the Alfalfa app) versus conventional outpatient clinic management from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020. Patients in the online management group used the Alfalfa app to communicate coagulation test results and other relevant information to a doctor or clinical pharmacist, who then responded with the dose adjustment plan and the date of the next blood test. The outcomes examined were the time in therapeutic range (TTR), incidence of clinical events (i.e., bleeding events, thrombotic events, warfarin-related emergency department visits, and warfarin-related hospital admissions), and the distribution of international normalized ratio (INR) values. Data from 117 patients were analyzed in this study. TTR was significantly higher in the online group than in the offline group (61.0% vs. 39.6%, P < 0.01). Incidence of major bleeding events, thrombotic events, and warfarin-related hospital admissions were comparable between the online and offline groups. However, minor bleeds (5.3% vs. 28.3%, P < 0.01) and warfarin-related emergency department visits (1.8% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.02) were significantly fewer in the online group than in the offline group. The proportion of INR values in the therapeutic range (53.8% vs. 40.1%, P < 0.01) was significantly higher in the online group. Warfarin management using the Alfalfa app appears to be a safe and effective method for warfarin management when patients cannot physically visit hospitals for follow-up.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mobile ApplicationsAnticoagulantsCommunicable Disease ControlHemorrhageHumansInternational Normalized RatioRetrospective StudiesWarfarinAnticoagulantsWarfarinCOVID-19Healthcare deliveryRemote consultationTelemedicineWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID35092566
PMCPMC8799972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.