Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092554›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2022

A scoping review of non-specific predictors, moderators, and mediators of family-based treatment for adolescent anorexia and bulimia nervosa: a summary of the current research findings.

Sasha Gorrell, Catherine E Byrne, Paige J Trojanowski, Sarah Fischer, Daniel Le Grange

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sasha GorrellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, 401 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. sasha.gorrell@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-8547
Catherine E ByrneDepartment of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Paige J TrojanowskiDepartment of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Sarah FischerDepartment of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Daniel Le GrangeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, 401 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
George Mason University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSD Leading the Advancement of Underrepresented Neuroscientists for Change (LAUNCH) Faculty Development ProgramR25NS117367 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Victoria B Risbrough, Joann Trejo · 2020 to 2026
$1.6M
Neural Correlates of Reinforcement Learning Specific to Hyperactivityin Adolescent Anorexia NervosaK23MH126201 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GORRELL, SASHA CATHERINE · 2021 to 2025
$848k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH126201NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS117367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis scoping review presents an up-to-date synthesis of the current evidence base for non-specific predictors, moderators, and mediators of family-based treatment (FBT) for adolescent anorexia and bulimia nervosa.

methodsWe identify ways in which end-of-treatment outcomes have been shown to differ based upon baseline clinical features and person-specific factors and explore psychological mechanisms that may explain differences in treatment response. We draw from this evidence base to outline recommendations for clinical practice, as well as directions for future clinical eating disorder research.

resultsNoted findings from review include that early response in weight gain and parental criticism may be particularly influential in treatment for anorexia nervosa. Further, for adolescents with either anorexia or bulimia nervosa, eating-related obsessionality may be a key intervention target to improve outcomes.

conclusionIn addition to highlighting a need for attention to specific patient- and caregiver-level factors that impact treatment response, recommendations for research and clinical practice include testing whether certain targeted treatments (e.g., exposure-based approaches) may be suitable within the context of FBT for eating disorders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I: Evidence obtained from: at least one properly designed randomized controlled trials; experimental studies.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaBulimia NervosaFeeding and Eating DisordersAdolescentAnorexiaFamily TherapyHumansAdolescent eating disordersFamily-based treatmentMediatorsModeratorsNon-specific predictors

Identifiers

PMID35092554
PMCPMC9872820
OpenAlexW4210316708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.