Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092541›Full record

ReviewGenetica2022

Heritability: What's the point? What is it not for? A human genetics perspective.

Nicolas Robette, Emmanuelle Génin, Françoise Clerget-Darpoux

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genetica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicolas RobetteENSAE-CREST (UMR 9194), Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3932-5964
Emmanuelle GéninInserm, Univ Brest, EFS, CHU Brest, UMR 1078 GGB, 22 avenue Camille Desmoulins, 29238, Brest Cedex 3, France. emmanuelle.genin@inserm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4117-2813
Françoise Clerget-DarpouxImagine Institute, INSERM UMR1163, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-6619

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we explain the concept of heritability and describe the different methods and the genotype-phenotype correspondences used to estimate heritability in the specific field of human genetics. Heritability studies are conducted on extremely diverse human traits: quantitative traits (physical, biological, but also cognitive and behavioral measurements) and binary traits (as is the case of most human diseases). Instead of variables such as education and socio-economic status as covariates in genetic studies, they are now the direct object of genetic analysis. We make a review of the different assumptions underlying heritability estimates and dispute the validity of most of them. Moreover, and maybe more importantly, we show that they are very often misinterpreted. These erroneous interpretations lead to a vision of a genetic determinism of human traits. This vision is currently being widely disseminated not only by the mass media and the mainstream press, but also by the scientific press. We caution against the dangerous implication it has both medically and socially. Contrarily to the field of animal and plant genetics for which the polygenic model and the concept of heritability revolutionized selection methods, we explain why it does not provide answer in human genetics.

Indexed as

Human GeneticsAnimalsHumansPhenotypeAssociationCausationCorrelationHeritabilityPolygenic additive modelTwin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.