Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092488›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2022

Using an Automated Speech Recognition Approach to Differentiate Between Normal and Aspirating Swallowing Sounds Recorded from Digital Cervical Auscultation in Children.

Thuy T Frakking, Anne B Chang, Christopher Carty, Jade Newing, Kelly A Weir, Belinda Schwerin, Stephen So

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thuy T FrakkingResearch Development Unit, Caboolture Hospital, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, McKean St, Caboolture, QLD, 4510, Australia. thuy.frakking@health.qld.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2724-6919
Anne B ChangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, 501 Stanley St, South Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia.
Christopher CartyResearch Development Unit, Caboolture Hospital, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, McKean St, Caboolture, QLD, 4510, Australia.
Jade NewingSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Kelly A WeirMenzies Health Institute QLD & School of Health Sciences & Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, 1 Parklands Avenue, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia.
Belinda SchwerinSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Stephen SoSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Griffith University · AUQueensland University of Technology · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of machine learning to accurately detect aspirating swallowing sounds in children is an evolving field. Previously reported classifiers for the detection of aspirating swallowing sounds in children have reported sensitivities between 79 and 89%. This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of using an automatic speaker recognition approach to differentiate between normal and aspirating swallowing sounds recorded from digital cervical auscultation in children. We analysed 106 normal swallows from 23 healthy children (median 13 months; 52.1% male) and 18 aspirating swallows from 18 children (median 10.5 months; 61.1% male) who underwent concurrent videofluoroscopic swallow studies with digital cervical auscultation. All swallowing sounds were on thin fluids. A support vector machine classifier with a polynomial kernel was trained on feature vectors that comprised the mean and standard deviation of spectral subband centroids extracted from each swallowing sound in the training set. The trained support vector machine was then used to classify swallowing sounds in the test set. We found high accuracy in the differentiation of aspirating and normal swallowing sounds with 98% overall accuracy. Sensitivity for the detection of aspiration and normal swallowing sounds were 89% and 100%, respectively. There were consistent differences in time, power spectral density and spectral subband centroid features between aspirating and normal swallowing sounds in children. This study provides preliminary research evidence that aspirating and normal swallowing sounds in children can be differentiated accurately using machine learning techniques.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersSpeech PerceptionAuscultationChildDeglutitionFemaleHumansMaleSoundAspirationCervical auscultationClassifierDeglutitionMachine learningSwallowing sounds

Identifiers

PMID35092488
PMCPMC9643257
OpenAlexW4210547799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.