SynthesisDysphagia2022
Outcomes of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Third-space endoscopy: Current techniques, clinical applications, and future directions.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Saudi Gastroenterology Association (SGA) clinical care pathway and standards of care for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in achalasia.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2026Article
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy in children with achalasia: A review of the literature.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Peroral Endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in pediatric achalasia: a retrospective cohort on institutional experience and quality of life.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- The application of gastrointestinal endoscopy in children: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Article
- Submucosal endoscopy: the present and future.Clinical endoscopy · 2023Review
- Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy in children with esophageal achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment modality in adult patients with achalasia cardia. There are limited data regarding the efficacy and safety of POEM in pediatric achalasia. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to analyze the outcomes of POEM in children and adolescents with achalasia cardia. Literature search was performed in Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane database for studies evaluating the outcome of POEM in pediatric achalasia between January 2010 and March 2021. Primary objective of the study was clinical success (Eckardt ≤ 3). Secondary outcomes included technical success, procedure duration, adverse events , and gastroesophageal reflux after POEM. A total of 14 studies (419 children, 234 boys) were included in the review. The subtypes of achalasia were type I (30.6%), type II (63.8%), and type III (5.6%). Pooled rate of technical success was 97.1% (95% CI 94.5-98.5%; I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.