Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092451›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Closed-suction drainage in thoracolumbar spinal surgery-clinical routine without evidence? a systematic review.

Klaus John Schnake, Matthias Pumberger, Denis Rappert, Achim Götz, Oleksandr Zolotoverkh, Rita Waligora, Max Joseph Scheyerer, Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drain versus no drain after intradural spine surgery: a 10-year multicenter study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Answer to the letter to the editor of M. Kataria et al. concerning "Local vancomycin therapy to reduce surgical site infection in adult spine surgery: a randomized prospective study" by Salimi S, et al. (Eur Spine J [2022];31:454-460).European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Klaus John SchnakeCenter for Spine and Scoliosis Therapy, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St.,Marien, Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias PumbergerSpine Department, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Denis RappertCenter for Spine and Scoliosis Therapy, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St.,Marien, Erlangen, Germany.
Achim GötzCenter for Spine and Scoliosis Therapy, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St.,Marien, Erlangen, Germany.
Oleksandr ZolotoverkhCenter for Spine and Scoliosis Therapy, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St.,Marien, Erlangen, Germany.
Rita WaligoraSpine Department, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Max Joseph ScheyererDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. max.scheyerer@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1392-3990
Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma
Malteser Waldkrankenhaus Erlangen · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe considered benefit of surgical drain use after spinal surgery is to prevent local accumulation of a haematoma by decompressing the closed space in the approach of the surgical site. In this context, the aim of the present systematic review was to prove the benefit of the routine use of closed-suction drains.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the literature according to the Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist and algorithm.

resultsFollowing the literature search, 401 potentially eligible investigations were identified. Eventually, a total of 24 studies with 8579 participants were included. Negative suction drainage led to a significantly higher volume of drainage fluid. Drainage duration longer than 72 h may be associated with a higher incidence of Surgical side infections (SSI); however, accompanying antibiotic treatment is unnecessary. Regarding postoperative haematoma and neurological complications, no evidence exists concerning their prevention. Hospital stay length and related costs may be elevated in patients with drainage but appear to depend on surgery type.

conclusionsWith regard to the existing literature, the use of closed-suction drainage in elective thoracolumbar spinal surgery is not associated with any proven benefit for patients and cannot decrease postoperative complications.

Indexed as

DrainageSurgical Wound InfectionHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsSuctionComplicationsPostoperative haematomaSpinal surgeryWound drains

Identifiers

PMID35092451
OpenAlexW4210685812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.