Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092394›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2022

Different Cytotoxic Effects of Vetiver Oil on Three Types of Cancer Cells, Mainly Targeting CNR2 on TNBC.

Mila Hanifa, Raditya Wulandari, Ummi Maryam Zulfin, Eri Prasetyo Nugroho, Sari Haryanti, Edy Meiyanto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Vetiver,Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hesperidin increases theJournal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mila HanifaCancer Chemoprevention Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sekip Utara II, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Raditya WulandariCancer Chemoprevention Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sekip Utara II, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Ummi Maryam ZulfinCancer Chemoprevention Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sekip Utara II, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Eri Prasetyo NugrohoCancer Chemoprevention Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sekip Utara II, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Sari HaryantiHerbal and Traditional Medicine Research Center, Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia.
Edy MeiyantoCancer Chemoprevention Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Sekip Utara II, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-0886-6322
Universitas Gadjah Mada · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate vetiver oil (VO) selectivity effects on several cancer cell types and identify the β-caryophyllene role and mechanisms to prevent cancer development.

methodsCytotoxic effects of VO on three types of cancer cells (WiDr, 4T1, T47D) were determined using MTT assay. VO's effects on the cell cycle and apoptosis were analyzed using flow cytometry. Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) of cells after treatment with VO was observed with DCFDA staining. Bioinformatics study and molecular docking were used to determine the molecular targets of VO.

resultsVO contained various essential oils in which β-caryophyllene was the most abundant. 4T1 cells performed the lowest IC50 value. WiDr and 4T1 cells showed an arrest in the G2/M phase, while T47D showed an increase of sub G1 population after VO treatment. On the other hand, apoptosis was only observed in WiDr and T47D cells. ROS levels were increased significantly in WiDr and T47D cells but not in 4T1 cells. Cannabinoids CB2 receptor (CNR2) was highly expressed in 4T1 cells and commonly exhibited a low survival rate on Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) patients. CNR2 was the notable target of β-caryophyllene and performed agonistic interaction, which might have contributed to its cytotoxic activity against 4T1 cells.

conclusionThe molecular interaction of VO cannabinoid agonists and the CNR2 receptor was the underlying cause of VO cytotoxicity, which is a VO distinction on TNBC. Therefore, VO is better suited for use as an anti-cancer agent in TNBC cells.

Indexed as

ChrysopogonAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell CycleCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansMolecular Docking SimulationPlant OilsReactive Oxygen SpeciesReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB2Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsCNR2 protein, humanPlant OilsReactive Oxygen SpeciesReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB2CNR2CytotoxicTNBCVetiver oilβ -caryophyllene

Identifiers

PMID35092394
PMCPMC9258650
OpenAlexW4210379686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.