Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092179›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology2022

Nanomedicine, a valuable tool for skeletal muscle disorders: Challenges, promises, and limitations.

Valentina Colapicchioni, Francesco Millozzi, Ornella Parolini, Daniela Palacios

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Nanomedicine, a valuable tool for skeletal muscle disorders: Challenges, promises, and limitations.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina ColapicchioniItalian National Research Council, Institute for Atmospheric Pollution Research (CNR-IIA), Rome, Italy.
Francesco MillozziHistology and Embryology Unit, DAHFMO, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Ornella ParoliniDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Daniela PalaciosDepartment of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2207-2369
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · ITUniversity of Miami Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscular dystrophies are a group of rare genetic disorders characterized by progressive muscle weakness, which, in the most severe forms, leads to the patient's death due to cardiorespiratory problems. There is still no cure available for these diseases and significant effort is being placed into developing new strategies to either correct the genetic defect or to compensate muscle loss by stimulating skeletal muscle regeneration. However, the vast anatomical extension of the target tissue poses great challenges to these goals, highlighting the need for complementary strategies. Nanomedicine is an actively evolving field that merges nanotechnologies with biomedical and pharmaceutical sciences. It holds great potential in regenerative medicine, both in supporting tissue engineering and regeneration, and in optimizing drug and oligonucleotide delivery and gene therapy strategies. In this review, we will summarize the state-of-the-art in the field of nanomedicine applied to skeletal muscle regeneration. We will discuss the recent work toward the development of nanopatterned scaffolds for tissue engineering, the efforts in the synthesis of organic and inorganic nanoparticles for gene therapy and drug delivery applications, as well as their use as immune modulators. Although nanomedicine holds great promise for muscle and other degenerative diseases, many challenges still need to be systematically addressed to assure a smooth transition from the bench to the bedside. This article is categorized under: Implantable Materials and Surgical Technologies > Nanotechnology in Tissue Repair and Replacement.

Indexed as

Muscular DiseasesNanomedicineHumansMuscle, SkeletalNanotechnologyRegenerative MedicineTissue Engineeringnanomedicinescaffoldsskeletal muscletarget nanoparticlestissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35092179
PMCPMC9285803
OpenAlexW4224250054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.