Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35092159›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2022

Critical assessment of the current indicator for antenatal iron-containing supplementation coverage: Insights from a mixed-methods study.

Aatekah Owais, Sara Wuehler, Rebecca Heidkamp, Vrinda Mehra, Lynnette M Neufeld, Lisa M Rogers, Kuntal Kumar Saha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Aatekah OwaisNutrition International, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9148-843X
Sara WuehlerNutrition International, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1972-0150
Rebecca HeidkampInternational Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Vrinda MehraData and Analytics Section, Division of Data, Analysis, Planning and Monitoring, UNICEF, New York City, New York, USA.
Lynnette M NeufeldGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Geneva, Switzerland.
Lisa M RogersDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kuntal Kumar SahaDepartment of Nutrition and Food Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
World Health Organization · CHGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition · CHHospital for Sick Children · CAJohns Hopkins University · USNutrition International · CAUnited Nations Children's Fund · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Daily consumption of iron-containing supplements is recommended for all pregnant women but there is no approved global standard indicator for assessing supplementation coverage. Furthermore, the validity of commonly used coverage indicators for iron-containing supplement consumption is questionable. The WHO-UNICEF Technical Expert Advisory Group on Nutrition Monitoring, and partners, have systematically worked to identify a feasible and valid indicator of iron-containing supplement coverage for reporting by countries. In 2019, we conducted key informant interviews with respondents in eight countries, fielded an online survey (in three languages using SurveyMonkey) to which 142 nutrition professionals from 52 countries responded, and used Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) data from four countries to assess determinants of the quality of iron-containing supplement coverage data. Less than half (45%) of online survey respondents were satisfied with the current methods for collecting iron-containing supplement coverage data in their context. Recommended changes by study respondents include recall period <5 years, adding questions about counselling, including other beneficiary groups, and assessing supply chain functionality. The DHS analysis suggested an association between time since pregnancy and data quality. Data heaping on multiples of 30 was observed in 40%-75% of data. There is a clear demand for a revised indicator and measurement guidance for coverage of iron-containing supplementation during pregnancy. Future research should continue the development and validation of a global indicator, to more precisely validate the quality of recall data, including the distinction between distribution and consumption using various question formulations.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyIronDietary SupplementsFemaleFolic AcidHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareFolic AcidIroncoverage indicatorfeasibilityiron-containing supplementspregnant womenvalidity

Identifiers

PMID35092159
PMCPMC8932708
OpenAlexW4210487145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.