Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35091973›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2022

Differences in brain activity between fast and slow responses on psychomotor vigilance task: an fNIRS study.

Mateus G Nogueira, Mateus Silvestrin, Cândida S F Barreto, João Ricardo Sato, Rickson C Mesquita, Claudinei Biazoli, Abrahão F Baptista

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mateus G NogueiraCenter for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, UFABC - Universidade Federal do ABC -SP, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Bloco B, Sala 803, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0285-6545
Mateus SilvestrinCenter for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, UFABC - Universidade Federal do ABC -SP, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Bloco B, Sala 803, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3482-3676
Cândida S F BarretoCenter for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, UFABC - Universidade Federal do ABC -SP, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Bloco B, Sala 803, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6217-8099
João Ricardo SatoCenter for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, UFABC - Universidade Federal do ABC -SP, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Bloco B, Sala 803, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-9781
Rickson C MesquitaInstitute of Physics, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-6713
Claudinei BiazoliCenter for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, UFABC - Universidade Federal do ABC -SP, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Bloco B, Sala 803, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-4109
Abrahão F BaptistaCenter for Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, UFABC - Universidade Federal do ABC -SP, Avenida dos Estados, 5001, Bloco B, Sala 803, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil. a.baptista@ufabc.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7870-3820
Universidade Federal do ABC · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention is a basic human function underlying every other cognitive process. It is demonstrated in the functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging literature that frontoparietal networks are involved with attentive performance while default mode networks are involved with inattentive performance. Yet, it is still not clear whether similar results would be found with functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. The goal of our study was to investigate differences in hemodynamic activity measured by functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy between fast and slow responses on a simple sustained attention task both before and after stimulus onset. Thirty healthy adults took part in the study. Our results have shown differences between fast and slow responses only on channels over medial frontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex (p < 0,05). These differences were observed both before and after stimulus presentation. It is discussed that functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy is a good tool to investigate the frontoparietal network and its relationship with performance in attention tasks; it could be used to further investigate other approaches on attention, such as the dual network model of cognitive control and brain states views based on complex systems analysis; and finally, it could be used to investigate attention in naturalistic settings.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAdultAttentionBrainBrain MappingHumansPsychomotor PerformancefNIRSPsychomotor vigilance taskSustained attention

Identifiers

PMID35091973
OpenAlexW4221086791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.