Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35091924›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022

Effects of Persistent Exposure to COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes Among Trainees: a Longitudinal Survey Study.

Charles W Goss, Jennifer G Duncan, Sunny S Lou, Katherine J Holzer, Bradley A Evanoff, Thomas Kannampallil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charles W GossDivision of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Jennifer G DuncanDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Sunny S LouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Katherine J HolzerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Bradley A EvanoffDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Thomas KannampallilDepartment of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. thomas.k@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4119-4836

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCHT32GM108539 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Aaron J Norris · 2014 to 2026
$4.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM108539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created considerable strain on the physical and mental health of healthcare workers around the world. The effects have been acute for physician trainees-a unique group functioning simultaneously as learners and care providers with limited autonomy.

objectiveTo investigate the longitudinal effects of physician trainee exposure to patients being tested for COVID-19 on stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout using three surveys conducted during the early phase of the pandemic.

designLongitudinal survey study.

participantsAll physician trainees (N = 1375) at an academic medical center. MAIN MEASURE: Assess the relationship between repeated exposure to patients being tested for COVID-19 and stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout. KEY

resultsThree hundred eighty-nine trainees completed the baseline survey (28.3%). Of these, 191 and 136 completed the ensuing surveys. Mean stress, anxiety, and burnout decreased by 21% (95% confidence interval (CI): - 28 to - 12%; P < 0.001), 25% (95% CI: - 36 to - 11%; P < 0.001), and 13% (95% CI: - 18 to - 7%; P < 0.001), respectively, per survey. However, for each survey time point, there was mean increase in stress, anxiety, and burnout per additional exposure: stress [24% (95% CI: + 12 to + 38%; P < 0.001)], anxiety [22% (95% CI: + 2 to + 46%; P = 0.026)], and burnout [18% (95% CI: + 10 to + 28%; P < 0.001)]. For depression, the association between exposure was strongest for the third survey, where mean depression scores increased by 33% per additional exposure (95% CI: + 18 to + 50%; P < 0.001).

conclusionsTraining programs should adapt to address the detrimental effects of the "pileup" of distress associated with persistent exposure through adaptive programs that allow flexibility for time off and recovery.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19AnxietyDepressionHealth PersonnelHumansLongitudinal StudiesOutcome Assessment, Health CareSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnairesanxietyburnoutdepressionlongitudinal effectsmental healthphysician traineesstress

Identifiers

PMID35091924
PMCPMC8796740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.