ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2022
"Patient Lost to Follow-up": Opportunities and Challenges in Delivering Primary Care in Academic Medical Centers.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing Resident Experience in Continuity Clinic: Recommendations for Internal Medicine Residency Training-A Report from the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) and Association of Chiefs and Leaders of General Internal Medicine (ACLGIM) Hess Initiative Work Group on Learner Experience in Primary Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Traumatic Eyelid Laceration Repairs by Ophthalmology Residents Performed in the Emergency Department.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Characterizing heterogeneity in health-related quality of life trajectories in coronary artery disease: a longitudinal latent Markov analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Non-Adherence to Blood Glucose Testing Among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic Men with a History of Prediabetes in the United States.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Determinants of loss to follow-up after eye-related emergency visits: A race-stratified analysis at a level I trauma center.PloS one · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Continuously Diffused Oxygen Therapy Compared with Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Capacity building in pediatric surgical neuro-oncology: Assessment of clinical collaboration within limited resources in a low-middle-income country.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Factors associated with lost to follow-up and delayed follow-up in patients with choroidal nevus.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Improving genetics equity: identifying women eligible for genetic care services using mammography clinics in underserved areas as screening hubs.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Comparing Weight Loss and Metabolic Outcomes of Virtual Versus In-Person Follow-Up Care in Bariatrics: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at 12 and 36 Months Post-ESG.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Using mobile technology to increase adherence to sublingual immunotherapy: Real-world study with a new app/web platform AllergyVax®.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025Article
- Do patients who read visit notes on the patient portal have a higher rate of "loop closure" on diagnostic tests and referrals in primary care? A retrospective cohort study.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- The Interplay of Comorbidities in Chronic Heart Failure: Challenges and Solutions.Current cardiology reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcademic health centers (AHCs) face unique challenges in providing continuity to a medically and socially complex patient population. Little is known about what drives patient loss in these settings.
objectiveDetermine physician- and patient-based factors associated with patient loss in AHCs.
designRetrospective cohort study, embedded qualitative analysis.
settingAcademic health center.
participantsAll visits from 7/1/2014 to 6/30/2019; 89 physicians (51%) participated in a qualitative analysis. MEASURES: Physician-based factors (gender, years of service, hours of practice per week, trainee status, and departure during the study period) and patient-based factors (age, gender, race, limited English proficiency, public health insurance, chronic illness burden, and severe psychiatric illness burden) and their association with patient loss to follow-up, defined as a lapse in provider visit greater than 3 years.
resultsWe identified 402,415 visits for 41,876 distinct patients. A total of 9332 (22.3%) patients were lost to follow-up. Patient factors associated with loss to follow-up included patient age < 40 (HR 3.12 (2.94-3.33)), identification as non-white (HR 1.07 (1.10-1.13)), limited English proficiency (HR 1.18 (1.04-1.33)), and use of public insurance (HR 1.12 (1.04-1.21)). Provider factors associated with patient loss included trainee status (HR 3.74 (2.43-5.75)) and having recently departed from the practice (HR 1.98, 1.66-2.35). Structured interviews with clinical providers revealed unfavorable relationships with providers and staff (35%), inconvenience accessing primary care (23%), unreliable health insurance (18%), difficulty accessing one's primary care provider (14%), and patient/provider transitions (10%) as reasons for patient loss.
conclusionsYounger patient age, markers of social vulnerability, and physician transiency are associated with patient loss at AHCs, providing targets to improve continuity of care within these settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.