Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35091874›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022

COVID-19 CT Scan Lung Segmentation: How We Do It.

Davide Negroni, Domenico Zagaria, Andrea Paladini, Zeno Falaschi, Anna Arcoraci, Michela Barini, Alessandro Carriero

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CT-Based Evaluation of the Shape of the Diaphragm Using 3D Slicer.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quantitative Analysis for Lung Disease on Thin-Section CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Davide NegroniDepartment of Radiology, "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, AOU Maggiore Della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, Italy. dvdngr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1570-3695
Domenico ZagariaDepartment of Radiology, "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, AOU Maggiore Della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, Italy.
Andrea PaladiniDepartment of Radiology, "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, AOU Maggiore Della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, Italy.
Zeno FalaschiDepartment of Radiology, "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, AOU Maggiore Della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, Italy.
Anna ArcoraciDepartment of Radiology, "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, AOU Maggiore Della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, Italy.
Michela BariniDepartment of Radiology, "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, AOU Maggiore Della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, Italy.
Alessandro CarrieroDepartment of Radiology, "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, AOU Maggiore Della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, Italy.
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The National Health Systems have been severely stressed out by the COVID-19 pandemic because 14% of patients require hospitalization and oxygen support, and 5% require admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Relationship between COVID-19 prognosis and the extent of alterations on chest CT obtained by both visual and software-based quantification that expresses objective evaluations of the percentage of ventilated lung parenchyma compared to the affected one has been proven. While commercial applications for automatic medical image computing and visualization are expensive and limited in their spread, the open-source systems are characterized by not enough standardization and time-consuming troubles. We analyzed chest CT exams on 246 patients suspected of COVID-19 performed in the Emergency Department CT room. The lung parenchyma segmentation was obtained by a threshold-based method using the open-source 3D Slicer software and software tools called "Segment Editor" and "Segment Quantification." For the three main characteristics analyzed on lungs affected by COVID-19 pneumonia, a specifical densitometry value range was defined: from - 950 to - 700 HU for well-aerated parenchyma; from - 700 to - 250 HU for interstitial lung disease; from - 250 to 250 HU for parenchymal consolidation. For the well-aerated parenchyma and the interstitial alterations, the procedure was semi-automatic with low time consumption, whereas consolidations' analysis needed manual interventions by the operator. After the chest CT, 13% of the sample was admitted to intensive care, while 34% of them to the sub-intensive care. In patients moved to intensive care, the parenchyma analysis reported a higher crazy paving presentation. The quantitative analysis of the alterations affecting the lung parenchyma of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia can be performed by threshold method segmentation on 3D Slicer. The segmentation could have an important role in the quantification in different COVID-19 pneumonia presentations, allowing to help the clinician in the correct management of patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansLungPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedCOVID-19Image processing, computer-assistedLung volume measurementsPneumoniaStandardsTomography, spiral computed

Identifiers

PMID35091874
PMCPMC8796745
OpenAlexW4210417573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.