ArticleClinical oral investigations2022
Effect of fibrin glue on the healing efficacy of deproteinized bovine bone and autologous bone in critical-sized calvarial defects in rats.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Bioresorbable Bone Wax for Potentiated Hemostasis and Osteogenesis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Biofunctional response of a synthetic ceramic of 99.9% tricalcium phosphate associated with a heterologous fibrin biopolymer and infrared photobiomodulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- 3D printed membranes of polylactic acid and graphene oxide for guided bone regeneration.Nanoscale advances · 2023Article
- Electrospun polycaprolactone incorporated with fluorapatite nanoparticles composite scaffolds enhance healing of experimental calvarial defect on rats.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn order to verify the hypothesis that fibrin glue (FG) is able to seal the area of bone grafting and facilitate bone regeneration. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-one Sprague-Dawley rats with critical-sized calvarial bone defects were randomly assigned to three groups: (A) co-administrated deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and autologous bone grafts with FG [fibrin ( +)], (B) co-administrated DBB and autologous bone grafts without FG [fibrin ( -)], and (C) no graft as control. Four weeks and 8 weeks later, micro-CT analysis and histomorphometric analysis were carried out to evaluate following parameters: bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), percentage of new bone area (Pe.NB), average thickness of bone defect (Th.BD), average thickness of basal bone (Th.BB), and percentage of new bone in center of the skull defect (Pe.NBc).
resultsBV/TV, Tb.Th, and Tb.N in fibrin ( -) group were significantly higher than that of fibrin ( +) group (p = 0.008, 0.000, 0.007, respectively) and control group (p = 0.004, 0.001, and 0.007, respectively) at 8 weeks. Pe.NB in fibrin ( -) group (33.67 ± 11.72%) was significantly higher than that of fibrin ( +) group (12.33 ± 3.21%) (p = 0.038) and control group (9.66 ± 8.50%) (p = 0.045) at 8 weeks. Pe.NBc in fibrin ( -) group (12.05 ± 3.91%) was significantly higher than that of fibrin ( +) group (4.79 ± 1.21%) (p = 0.005) and control group (0.00 ± 0.00%) (p = 0.000) at 4 weeks.
conclusionsAdministration of both DBB and autograft stimulates calvarial bone defect regeneration, while combination of FG does not additionally accelerate new bone formation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The use of fibrin to cement traditional bone graft materials in oral clinical practice requires caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.