Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35091814›Full record

ArticleAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2022

Human-Device Interaction in the Life Science Laboratory.

Robert Söldner, Sophia Rheinländer, Tim Meyer, Michael Olszowy, Jonas Austerjost

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert SöldnerSartorius Corporate Research, Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.
Sophia RheinländerDepartment of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Tim MeyerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael OlszowySartorius Corporate Research, Sartorius Stedim North America Inc, Bohemia, NY, USA.
Jonas AusterjostSartorius Corporate Research, Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany. jonas.austerjost@sartorius.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction of the human user with equipment and software is a central aspect of the work in the life science laboratory. The enhancement of the usability and intuition of software and hardware products, as well as holistic interaction solutions are a demand from all stakeholders in the scientific laboratory who desire more efficient workflows. Shorter training periods, parallelization of workflows, improved data integrity, and enhanced safety are only a few advantages innovative intuitive human-device-interfaces can bring. With recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), the availability of smart devices, as well as unified communication protocols, holistic interaction solutions are on the rise. Future interaction in the laboratory will not be limited to pushing mechanical buttons on equipment. Instead, the interplay between voice, gestures, and innovative hard- and software components will drive interactions in the laboratory into a more streamlined future.

Indexed as

Biological Science DisciplinesUser-Computer InterfaceArtificial IntelligenceHumansSoftwareArtificial intelligenceHuman–device interactionNatural user interfacesSmart devices

Identifiers

PMID35091814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.