Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35091792›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2022

Initial clinical experience with a novel flexible endoscopic robot for transanal surgery.

M Morino, E Forcignanò, A Arezzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Robotics in interventional endoscopy-evolution and the way forward.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M MorinoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, C.so Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy. mario.morino@unito.it.
E ForcignanòDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, C.so Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.
A ArezzoDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, C.so Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2110-4082

Funding

Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca Dipartimenti di Eccellenza ex L.232/2016'
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Flex

methodsWe prospectively collected all consecutive cases of local excisions of rectal lesions performed with the Flex

resultsBetween October 2018 and February 2020, 26 patients were treated. We performed a full-thickness excision in 14 patients and a submucosal dissection in 12. The median operating time was 115 min (range 45-360 min). In six patients (23.1%), we converted to standard transanal endoscopic operation (TEO

conclusionsThis first clinical series demonstrates that the Flex

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsRoboticsTransanal Endoscopic MicrosurgeryTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryAnal CanalHumansRectumTreatment OutcomeColorectal cancerEndoluminal surgeryRobotic surgeryTransanal endoscopic microsurgery

Identifiers

PMID35091792
PMCPMC8917022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.