SynthesisClinical rheumatology2022
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroid in the treatment of hand osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review and network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of parmacotherapy for hand osteoarthritis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of corticosteroids for hand osteoarthritis - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.MedComm · 2026Review
- The challenge of pharmacotherapy for musculoskeletal pain: an overview of unmet needs.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid therapy including oral corticosteroid and intra-articular corticosteroid in patients with hand osteoarthritis (OA), to provide treatment recommendations, and provide data-driven suggestions for future studies.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed from inception to February 19, 2020, and the study was conducted on February 20, 2020. All controlled trials in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library reporting the efficacy on pain, functional recovery, and adverse events of corticosteroids in hand osteoarthritis were selected. The primary outcome was pain assessed on a visual analogue scale (VAS) lasting for up to 24 weeks. Pooled mean difference (MD) for continuous variable and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous variable, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), was assessed by a random effects model.
resultsOverall, seven trials totaling 511 participants were included in this study. The pooled analysis showed a significant difference in VAS pain (MD, - 5.75; 95% CI, - 10.08 to - 1.42, I
conclusionOur data suggest corticosteroids in hand OA might improve local pain and promote functional recovery. However, since these findings were based on only 7 studies and due to significant heterogeneity across the included studies, these findings need to be confirmed by future clinical trials with a higher number of patients. KEY POINTS: • Current evidences of glucocorticoids for the management of hand osteoarthritis (OA) were insufficient and more evidences were needed. • The results of the present meta-analysis revealed corticosteroids in hand OA might improve local pain and promote functional recovery. • These findings need to be confirmed by future clinical trials with a higher number of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.