Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35091771›Full record

SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2022

Ocular Complications Post-Cosmetic Periocular Hyaluronic Acid Injections: A Systematic Review.

Hatan Mortada, Hadeel Seraj, Omar Barasain, Basma Bamakhrama, Nawaf Ibrahim Alhindi, Khalid Arab

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ophthalmic complications of injectable facial fillers.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Acute diplopia after glabellar hyaluronic acid filler injection.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hatan MortadaDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University and Department of Plastic Surgery & Burn Unit, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. hatanmortada@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1283-4136
Hadeel SerajDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Omar BarasainCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Basma BamakhramaFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Nawaf Ibrahim AlhindiFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid ArabDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SAKing Saud University · SAKing Saud Medical City · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the global rise in the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers as a minimally invasive cosmetic procedure, significant adverse effects such as vascular compromise and blindness have become common. Hence, we present the first systematic review aimed to investigate ocular complications secondary to a facial HA injection and to understand the presentation, cause, management, and outcome of these complications.

methodsThe preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to report this review. A systematic search was performed in July 2021 for published literature using the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases. The following terms were used: facial fillers, facial injections, hyaluronic acid, blindness, ophthalmoplegia, diplopia, ptosis, ophthalmic artery occlusion, posterior ciliary artery occlusion, and ocular ischemic syndrome.

resultsA total of 2496 publications were searched, and 34 articles published between January 2000 and July 2021 were included. Twenty-seven case reports and seven case series were evaluated. The nose was the most common site of injection (n = 25; 40.67%). Ocular pain was the most common initial symptom of ocular complications (n = 13, 22.41 %). The most common complication was vision loss (n = 17, 50%). The majority of patients received hyaluronidase, aspirin, and steroids. Regarding the outcome, 15 (45.45%) of the published studies showed no improvement in complications even after management.

conclusionHA is gaining popularity in cosmetic applications. Post-HA ocular complications nearly always have an immediate onset. Proper knowledge of potential adverse events is crucial for clinicians to attempt to decrease complications and improve outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesDermal FillersBlindnessFaceHumansHyaluronic AcidDermal FillersHyaluronic AcidHyaluronic acidInjectionsOphthalmoplegiaVision loss

Identifiers

PMID35091771
OpenAlexW4210380889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.