ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2022
Automated liquid handling robot for rapid lateral flow assay development.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impurity Characterization Across Drug Development Stages: Analytical Methodologies and Regulatory Perspectives.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Review
- Quantum Spin Detection in Microfiltration Immunoassays for Ultrasensitive and High-Throughput Diagnostics.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- A comprehensive review of lateral flow assays in rapid livestock and poultry disease diagnostics.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2026Article
- Current and future opportunities for lateral flow immunoassay strips based on tunable plasmonic properties of gold nanoparticles.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- Adding a Twist to Lateral Flow Immunoassays: A Direct Replacement of Antibodies with Helical Affibodies, from Selection to Application.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Accelerated Development of a COVID-19 Lateral Flow Test in an Academic Setting: Lessons Learned.Accounts of chemical research · 2024Article
- Paper based microfluidic devices: a review of fabrication techniques and applications.The European physical journal. Special topics · 2023Review
- Diagnoses Based on C-Reactive Protein Point-of-Care Tests.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Performance of novel antibodies for lipoarabinomannan to develop diagnostic tests for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lateral flow assay (LFA) is one of the most popular technologies on the point-of-care diagnostics market due to its low cost and ease of use, with applications ranging from pregnancy to environmental toxins to infectious disease. While the use of these tests is relatively straightforward, significant development time and effort are required to create tests that are both sensitive and specific. Workflows to guide the LFA development process exist but moving from target selection to an LFA that is ready for field testing can be labor intensive, resource heavy, and time consuming. To reduce the cost and the duration of the LFA development process, we introduce a novel development platform centered on the flexibility, speed, and throughput of an automated robotic liquid handling system. The system comprises LFA-specific hardware and software that enable large optimization experiments with discrete and continuous variables such as antibody pair selection or reagent concentration. Initial validation of the platform was demonstrated during development of a malaria LFA but was readily expanded to encompass development of SARS-CoV-2 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis LFAs. The validity of the platform, where optimization experiments are run directly on LFAs rather than in solution, was based on a direct comparison between the robotic system and a more traditional ELISA-like method. By minimizing hands-on time, maximizing experiment size, and enabling improved reproducibility, the robotic system improved the quality and quantity of LFA assay development efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.