Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35091635›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Mapping native and non-native vegetation in the Brazilian Cerrado using freely available satellite products.

Kennedy Lewis, Fernanda de V Barros, Marcio B Cure, Christian A Davies, Mariana N Furtado, Timothy C Hill, Marina Hirota, Demétrius L Martins, Guilherme G Mazzochini, Edward T A Mitchard and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kennedy LewisCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. kl378@exeter.ac.uk.
Fernanda de V BarrosCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Marcio B CureDepartment of Ecology and Zoology, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Christian A DaviesShell International Exploration and Production Inc, Shell Technology Centre, Houston, TX, USA.
Mariana N FurtadoDepartment of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Timothy C HillCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Marina HirotaDepartment of Physics, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.
Demétrius L MartinsDepartment of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Guilherme G MazzochiniDepartment of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Edward T A MitchardSchool of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Cássia B R MunhozDepartment of Botany, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Rafael S OliveiraDepartment of Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Alexandre B SampaioCentro Nacional de Avaliação da Biodiversidade e de Pesquisa e Conservação do Cerrado CBC Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade - ICMBio, Brasília, Brazil.
Nicholas A SaraivaFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Isabel B SchmidtDepartment of Ecology, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Lucy RowlandCollege of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native vegetation across the Brazilian Cerrado is highly heterogeneous and biodiverse and provides important ecosystem services, including carbon and water balance regulation, however, land-use changes have been extensive. Conservation and restoration of native vegetation is essential and could be facilitated by detailed landcover maps. Here, across a large case study region in Goiás State, Brazil (1.1 Mha), we produced physiognomy level maps of native vegetation (n = 8) and other landcover types (n = 5). Seven different classification schemes using different combinations of input satellite imagery were used, with a Random Forest classifier and 2-stage approach implemented within Google Earth Engine. Overall classification accuracies ranged from 88.6-92.6% for native and non-native vegetation at the formation level (stage-1), and 70.7-77.9% for native vegetation at the physiognomy level (stage-2), across the seven different classifications schemes. The differences in classification accuracy resulting from varying the input imagery combination and quality control procedures used were small. However, a combination of seasonal Sentinel-1 (C-band synthetic aperture radar) and Sentinel-2 (surface reflectance) imagery resulted in the most accurate classification at a spatial resolution of 20 m. Classification accuracies when using Landsat-8 imagery were marginally lower, but still reasonable. Quality control procedures that account for vegetation burning when selecting vegetation reference data may also improve classification accuracy for some native vegetation types. Detailed landcover maps, produced using freely available satellite imagery and upscalable techniques, will be important tools for understanding vegetation functioning at the landscape scale and for implementing restoration projects.

Identifiers

PMID35091635
PMCPMC8799689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.