ArticleBritish dental journal2022
The presenting dental status of solid tumours with bone metastases requiring bone-targeting agents - part 2: breast cancer.
Article in British dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The presenting dental status of solid tumours with bone metastases requiring bone-targeting agents - part 4: miscellaneous cancers.British dental journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Patients with bony metastatic breast cancer (MBC) due to receive bone-targeting agents (BTA) are expected to undertake a dental assessment before commencing. The aim of this study was to determine the dental status of this tumour group and understand the challenges the dental practitioner faces in attempting to achieve 'dental fitness'.Materials and methods Data were retrospectively collected from a dedicated pre-BTA dental assessment clinic and analysed for MBC. Statistical analysis and observational data were used to compare patient and tumour demographics.Results A total of 229 patients were included in this cohort. On average, this cohort loses one tooth per decade (p = 0.003). Classifying the tumour sub-types provided observational differences in dental status with patients with triple negative MBC having the best dentition at presentation. These observations were more clinically profound when overlaid with survival following post-BTA dental assessment as patients with triple negative MBC had the lowest median survival (eight months, p = 0.002). In contrast, patients with luminal A breast cancer had a very complex presenting dentition with a median survival of 20 months.Conclusion A clear difference exists in the outcomes of MBC patients and therefore a pre-BTA dental assessment should consider and integrate both patient and tumour demographics into dental treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35091612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.