Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35091463›Full record

Trial reportRMD open2022

Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study.

Nina Paulshus Sundlisæter, Ulf Sundin, Anna-Birgitte Aga, Joseph Sexton, Hilde Berner Hammer, Till Uhlig, Tore K Kvien, Espen A Haavardsholm, Siri Lillegraven

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in RMD open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nina Paulshus SundlisæterDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway ninasundlisater@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1295-0172
Ulf SundinDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1860-6150
Anna-Birgitte AgaDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Joseph SextonDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Hilde Berner HammerDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7317-8991
Till UhligDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6881-9552
Tore K KvienDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8441-3093
Espen A HaavardsholmDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Siri LillegravenDivision of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate limiting factors of American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR Boolean remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and compare patients who fulfil the criteria to patients who only partly fulfil the criteria, with respect to imaging inflammation and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) usage.

methodsPatients with DMARD-naïve RA were treated according to current recommendations in the the ARCTIC trial (Aiming for Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial examining the benefit of ultrasound in a Clinical TIght Control regimen). Limiting factors of reaching ACR/EULAR Boolean remission at 2 years were assessed. Imaging inflammation (ultrasound and MRI) in patients in remission was compared with patients failing to fulfil different components of the criteria. The OR of biologic therapy was calculated using logistic regression.

resultsOf 203 patients, 112 (55%) reached ACR/EULAR Boolean remission; 49 (24%) fulfilled three of four criteria. The main limiting factors were patient global assessment (PGA) (59%) and tender joints (22%). Imaging inflammation was not significantly different for patients in remission and patients not fulfilling the criteria due to elevated PGA and/or tender joints, but higher odds of using biologics (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.73 to 7.61) were observed.

conclusionsPGA and tender joints were the factors most often limiting achievement of ACR/EULAR Boolean remission. The level of imaging inflammation was not elevated in these patients compared with patients in remission, but the odds of using biologic DMARDs were higher.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidRheumatologyBiological TherapyHumansInflammationRemission InductionSeverity of Illness Indexpatient reported outcome measuresrheumatoid arthritisultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35091463
PMCPMC8804675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.