Observational studyRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2022
Exploring the utility of assistive artificial intelligence for ultrasound scanning in regional anesthesia.
Observational study in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study to Evaluate the Performance and Potential Benefits of an Assistive Artificial Intelligence Device ScanNav Anatomy Peripheral Nerve Block - US V1.0 for Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia
Usage Of Artificial Intelligence-Integrated Usg In Application of Pectoral Block In Mastectomies
Exploring the Efficacy of Assistive Artificial Intelligence for Ultrasound Guided Regional Anesthesia in Residency Training
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- State-of-the-art anesthesia practices: a comprehensive review on optimizing patient safety and recovery.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Examining the impact perceptual learning artificial-intelligence-based on the incidence of paresthesia when performing the ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic block: simulation-based randomized study.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Trial
- Spatial Validation of General-Purpose Multimodal AI-Generated Target Regions in Peripheral Nerve Block Ultrasound.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Comment on 'Artificial intelligence-generated color overlay for ultrasound identification of the brachial plexus in regional anesthesia: an external validation study by Kamimura et al.'Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-generated color overlay for ultrasound identification of the brachial plexus in regional anesthesia: an external validation study.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and predictive analytics in obstetric anesthesia: early warning for maternal complications.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026Review
- Data annotation and its evaluation in artificial intelligence-based anatomy recognition for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: a clinical perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: bridging the gap between potential and practice: a narrative review.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Artificial intelligence revolutionizing anesthesia management: advances and prospects in intelligent anesthesia technology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: a bibliometric analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024Review
- Current evidence on artificial intelligence in regional anesthesia.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Review
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Anaesthesiology: Enhancing Patient Outcomes and Clinical Efficiency.Cureus · 2024Review
- Optimising artificial intelligence ultrasound tools in anaesthesiology and perioperative medicine: The next frontier for advanced technology application.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia: An explorative scoping review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence for ultrasound scanning in regional anaesthesia: a scoping review of the evidence from multiple disciplines.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Supported Ultrasonography in Anesthesiology: Evaluation of a Patient in the Operating Theatre.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2024Article
- Variability between human experts and artificial intelligence in identification of anatomical structures by ultrasound in regional anaesthesia: a framework for evaluation of assistive artificial intelligence.British journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- Optimal view detection for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block using deep learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUltrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) involves the acquisition and interpretation of ultrasound images to delineate sonoanatomy. This study explores the utility of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) device designed to assist in this task (ScanNav Anatomy Peripheral Nerve Block; ScanNav), which applies a color overlay on real-time ultrasound to highlight key anatomical structures.
methodsThirty anesthesiologists, 15 non-experts and 15 experts in UGRA, performed 240 ultrasound scans across nine peripheral nerve block regions. Half were performed with ScanNav. After scanning each block region, participants completed a questionnaire on the utility of the device in relation to training, teaching, and clinical practice in ultrasound scanning for UGRA. Ultrasound and color overlay output were recorded from scans performed with ScanNav. Experts present during the scans (real-time experts) were asked to assess potential for increased risk associated with use of the device (eg, needle trauma to safety structures). This was compared with experts who viewed the AI scans remotely.
resultsNon-experts were more likely to provide positive and less likely to provide negative feedback than experts (p=0.001). Positive feedback was provided most frequently by non-experts on the potential role for training (37/60, 61.7%); for experts, it was for its utility in teaching (30/60, 50%). Real-time and remote experts reported a potentially increased risk in 12/254 (4.7%) vs 8/254 (3.1%, p=0.362) scans, respectively. DISCUSSION: ScanNav shows potential to support non-experts in training and clinical practice, and experts in teaching UGRA. Such technology may aid the uptake and generalizability of UGRA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04918693.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.